Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248815
Summary: Review Request: trac-bazaar-plugin - Support for Bazaar source repositories in trac Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: toshio@tiki-lounge.com QAContact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,notting@redhat.com
Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~toshio/packages/trac-bazaar-plugin.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~toshio/packages/trac-bazaar-plugin-0.2-1.20070717bz...
Description: This plugin for Trac provides support for the Bazaar SCM.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: trac-bazaar-plugin - Support for Bazaar source repositories in trac
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248815
tibbs@math.uh.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody@fedoraproject.org |tibbs@math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: trac-bazaar-plugin - Support for Bazaar source repositories in trac
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248815
tibbs@math.uh.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
------- Additional Comments From tibbs@math.uh.edu 2007-07-28 00:06 EST ------- I guess this looks just like the other two trac SCM plugins already in the distro.
You can probably remove the initial comment from the spec.
The only thing I can complain about is inconsistent macroization (%{__python} but not %{__rm}). I vaguely remember something special about python that exempted it from the usual "consistent use of macros" rule, but I can't recall the details. In any case, I trust you to fix things up as appropriate.
* source files match upstream. Verified manually by generating the tarball according to the instructions in the spec and comparing the contents. * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: trac-bazaar-plugin = 0.2-1.20070717bzr180.fc8 = bzr python(abi) = 2.5 python-setuptools trac * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. I haven't the means to test this package. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
APPROVED
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: trac-bazaar-plugin - Support for Bazaar source repositories in trac
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248815
------- Additional Comments From toshio@tiki-lounge.com 2007-07-28 12:36 EST ------- Thanks tibbs!
(In reply to comment #1)
You can probably remove the initial comment from the spec.
Done.
The only thing I can complain about is inconsistent macroization (%{__python} but not %{__rm}). I vaguely remember something special about python that exempted it from the usual "consistent use of macros" rule, but I can't recall the details. In any case, I trust you to fix things up as appropriate.
I'm unable to find details either so I made this consistent as well.
- %check is not present; no test suite upstream. I haven't the means to test
this package.
This is running on the Fedora Infrastructure trac instance ATM:: https://hosted.fedoraproject.org/projects/packagedb/browser
URLs for packages that will be imported:: http://fedorapeople.org/~toshio/packages/trac-bazaar-plugin.spec
http://fedorapeople.org/~toshio/packages/trac-bazaar-plugin-0.2-2.20070717bz...
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: trac-bazaar-plugin - Support for Bazaar source repositories in trac
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248815
toshio@tiki-lounge.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs?
------- Additional Comments From toshio@tiki-lounge.com 2007-07-28 12:39 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: trac-bazaar-plugin Short Description: Bazaar plugin for Trac Owners: toshio@tiki-lounge.com Branches: FC-6 F-7 EL-5 InitialCC:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: trac-bazaar-plugin - Support for Bazaar source repositories in trac
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248815
tibbs@math.uh.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
------- Additional Comments From tibbs@math.uh.edu 2007-07-28 12:41 EST ------- CVS done.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: trac-bazaar-plugin - Support for Bazaar source repositories in trac
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248815
toshio@tiki-lounge.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE Fixed In Version| |0.2-2.20070717bzr180
------- Additional Comments From toshio@tiki-lounge.com 2007-08-09 05:18 EST ------- Package built and pushed to the repository.
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org