Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Merge Review: comps-extras
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225652
katzj(a)redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flag|fedora-review- |fedora-review?
------- Additional Comments From katzj(a)redhat.com 2007-02-05 16:38 EST -------
(In reply to comment #1)
rpmlint output:
W: comps-extras no-url-tag
Yep, there's not one.
W: comps-extras no-documentation
And there isn't any
Random notes:
* Consider changing the buildroot to
%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
Sure, done.
* URL should be provided for upstream tarball at least, to check
against (MUST
item)
There isn't an upstream tarball location. The upstream _are_ the packages that
are built.
* GPL may not be a very appropriate license for a set of PNG images
It's not normal, but it's fine.
* Change make to "make %{?_smp_mflags}"
Given that there's nothing actually done, this doesn't actually make a difference
* Change %defattr(-,root,root) to %defattr(-,root,root,-)
Sure
* Packages puts files in /usr/share/pixmaps without owning that
directory or
depending on any packages that owns it (blocker).
/usr/share/pixmaps is owned by the filesystem package. I'm pretty sure we don't
have things requiring it
* Better add extra slash at the end of %{_datadir}/pixmaps/comps to
show it's a
directory: %{_datadir}/pixmaps/comps/
One better; added the directory as %dir and then the files underneath.
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.