Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: perl-qooxdoo-compat (for EPEL) - Perl backend for Qooxdoo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=758451
Summary: Review Request: perl-qooxdoo-compat (for EPEL) - Perl backend for Qooxdoo Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora@mickweiss.com QAContact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: notting@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: ---
Spec URL: http://mickweiss.com/fedora/rpmbuild/SPECS/perl-qooxdoo-compat.spec SRPM URL: http://mickweiss.com/fedora/rpmbuild/SRPMS/perl-qooxdoo-compat-0.7.3-7.el6.s... Description: Perl backend for Qooxdoo
This is the same package that is packaged for Fedora (but not in EPEL).
terjeros (the maintainer for perl-qooxdoo-compat) said: "I don't maintain EPEL packages,sorry."
This is where my co-maintainer (Edmund Wong) and myself are jumping in.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=758451
Mick Weiss fedora@mickweiss.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|rawhide |el6 Component|Package Review |Package Review CC| |fedora-package-review@redha | |t.com Product|Fedora |Fedora EPEL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=758451
Mick Weiss fedora@mickweiss.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE Last Closed| |2011-12-01 16:54:36
--- Comment #1 from Mick Weiss fedora@mickweiss.com 2011-12-01 16:54:36 EST ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 465710 ***
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org