[Bug 462173] New: Review Request: terminator - the robot future of terminals

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Review Request: terminator - the robot future of terminals

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462173

Summary: Review Request: terminator - the robot future of
                    terminals
           Product: Fedora
           Version: rawhide
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: medium
          Priority: medium
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: [e-mail]
        ReportedBy: [e-mail]
         QAContact: [e-mail]
                CC: [e-mail], [e-mail]
   Estimated Hours: 0.0
    Classification: Fedora

Spec URL: http://mspevack.fedorapeople.org/terminator/terminator.spec

SRPM URL:
http://mspevack.fedorapeople.org/terminator/terminator-0.10-2.fc9.src.rpm

Description:

Multiple GNOME terminals in one window.  This is a project to produce
an efficient way of filling a large area of screen space with
terminals. This is done by splitting the window into a resizeable
grid of terminals. As such, you can  produce a very flexible
arrangements of terminals for different tasks.

[Bug 462173] Review Request: terminator - the robot future of terminals

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462173

Mamoru Tasaka  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |DUPLICATE

--- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka   2008-09-13 09:00:24 EDT ---
Umm..

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 454207 ***

[Bug 462173] Review Request: terminator - the robot future of terminals

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462173

Max Spevack  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |Reopened
             Status|CLOSED                      |ASSIGNED
         Resolution|DUPLICATE                   |

--- Comment #2 from Max Spevack   2008-09-15 12:41:40 EDT ---
Reopening, since the owner of 454207 said that he'd rather let me handle the
package, since he doesn't have time for it.  I'm marking 454207 a duplicate of
this bug.

[Bug 462173] Review Request: terminator - the robot future of terminals

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462173

Max Spevack  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |[e-mail]

--- Comment #3 from Max Spevack   2008-09-15 12:41:56 EDT ---
*** Bug 454207 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug 462173] Review Request: terminator - the robot future of terminals

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462173

Sven Lankes  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |[e-mail]
         AssignedTo|[e-mail]    |[e-mail]

[Bug 462173] Review Request: terminator - the robot future of terminals

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462173

Rahul Sundaram  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |[e-mail]

--- Comment #4 from Rahul Sundaram   2008-09-15 14:21:42 EDT ---
Max, are you sponsored already? If not, you should set need sponsor on this
ticket. If you require sponsorship, non-sponsors cannot do the official reviews
till you become a package maintainer. So this bit of information is important.

[Bug 462173] Review Request: terminator - the robot future of terminals

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462173

--- Comment #5 from Rahul Sundaram   2008-09-29 19:36:43 EDT ---
Sven Lankes,

Are you doing a review of this package?

[Bug 462173] Review Request: terminator - the robot future of terminals

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462173

--- Comment #6 from Sven Lankes   2008-09-30 02:16:00 EDT ---
Rahul,

yes - I am waiting for Max to fix the rpmlint errors. This is something I
discussed with him on IRC. Forgot to put a note about this on here ...

[Bug 462173] Review Request: terminator - the robot future of terminals

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462173

Chris Jones  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |[e-mail]

--- Comment #7 from Chris Jones   2008-10-02 06:13:19 EDT ---
Hey guys, thanks very much for the packaging efforts. Without wishing to rain
on your parade, I think it's worth mentioning that 0.11 has been released now.
I don't think it should significantly affect the packaging end of things
though.

[Bug 462173] Review Request: terminator - the robot future of terminals

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462173

Ian Weller  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |[e-mail]

--- Comment #8 from Ian Weller   2008-11-16 23:46:54 EDT ---
Ping? Just got a request with someone who's been speaking with upstream to get
this in Fedora.

[Bug 462173] Review Request: terminator - the robot future of terminals

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462173

--- Comment #9 from Chris Jones   2008-11-17 04:29:49 EDT ---
Ian: I'm at least part of upstream and I've not had anyone mention RPM
packaging to me for some time.

Perhaps one of the ones in
http://rpm.pbone.net/index.php3?stat=3&search=terminator&srodzaj=3 would be
helpful?
If not, let me know if there is anything I can do to help whoever is packaging
Terminator :)

thanks folks :)

[Bug 462173] Review Request: terminator - the robot future of terminals

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462173

Robert 'Bob' Jensen  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |[e-mail]

--- Comment #10 from Robert 'Bob' Jensen   2008-11-17 16:22:15 EDT ---
Chris,

I was the one that spoke to Ian, I simply mentioned that "Upstream is looking
for help getting terminator in to Fedora" this was based on a message I found
on the project's website.

Sorry for the confusion.

Robert 'Bob' Jensen

[Bug 462173] Review Request: terminator - the robot future of terminals

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462173

Robert 'Bob' Jensen  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |[e-mail]

--- Comment #11 from Robert 'Bob' Jensen   2008-11-30 19:51:36 EDT ---
*** Bug 473822 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug 462173] Review Request: terminator - the robot future of terminals

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462173

--- Comment #12 from Steven Harms   2008-11-30 20:56:26 EDT ---
I have created an update specfile which builds on FC10.  Please review this as
I believe it is the most correct, it is based off of the spec file distributed
with upstream, and I have submitted it in their bug tracker also.

http://www.sharms.org/files/terminator.spec

[Bug 462173] Review Request: terminator - the robot future of terminals

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462173

--- Comment #13 from Sven Lankes   2008-12-01 08:35:59 EDT ---
@Max - please state if you're still interested in packaging terminator. It
seems 
that there is quite a bit of interest in the package and it would be a shame to 
not have it in fedora soon.

[Bug 462173] Review Request: terminator - the robot future of terminals

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462173

--- Comment #14 from Robert 'Bob' Jensen   2008-12-01 11:45:45 EDT ---
Sven,

I talked to Max at about 1600 UTC today, He has been very busy and would not
object to someone picking this up to get the task finished. Would you be
willing to keep reviewing the package if someone else takes over the maintainer
role? Looks like Ian is the next in line to take over the package if he is
still interested. I have pinged Ian about it.

Robert 'Bob' Jensen

[Bug 462173] Review Request: terminator - the robot future of terminals

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462173

Robert 'Bob' Jensen  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|                            |needinfo?(ianweller@gmail.c
                   |                            |om)

[Bug 462173] Review Request: terminator - the robot future of terminals

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462173

--- Comment #15 from Steven Harms   2008-12-01 12:11:24 EDT ---
I also have an SRPM at
http://www.sharms.org/files/terminator-0.11-1.fc10.src.rpm for whoever wants to
test it out.

[Bug 462173] Review Request: terminator - the robot future of terminals

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462173

Ian Weller  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|needinfo?(ianweller@gmail.c |
                   |om)                         |

--- Comment #16 from Ian Weller   2008-12-01 13:39:24 EDT ---
I'll be taking over for Max. Standby for duplication messages.

Sven, I'd be delighted if you could take the new review request, when that
appears.

[Bug 462173] Review Request: terminator - the robot future of terminals

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462173

--- Comment #17 from Max Spevack   2008-12-01 13:44:52 EDT ---
/me hangs his head in shame, but is glad that someone is able to finish what he
started.

[Bug 462173] Review Request: terminator - the robot future of terminals

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462173

--- Comment #18 from Robert 'Bob' Jensen   2008-12-01 14:26:32 EDT ---
Don't worry Max, we all get busy at times so we understand where you are coming
from.

Robert 'Bob' Jensen

[Bug 462173] Review Request: terminator - the robot future of terminals

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462173

Jon Ciesla  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |[e-mail]

--- Comment #19 from Jon Ciesla   2008-12-01 14:35:41 EDT ---
Yeah, I wouldn't exactly categorize Max as a slacker. ;)

[Bug 462173] Review Request: terminator - the robot future of terminals

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462173

Ian Weller  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |DUPLICATE

--- Comment #20 from Ian Weller   2008-12-01 15:08:04 EDT ---

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 474036 ***