https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=988648
Bug ID: 988648 Summary: Review Request: libunity - Unity instrumenting and integration library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nobody@fedoraproject.org Reporter: cickumqt@gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: notting@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Spec URL: http://cicku.me/libunity.soec SRPM URL: http://cicku.me/libunity-6.12.0-1.fc20.src.rpm Description: LibUnity is library for instrumenting- and integrating with all aspects of the Unity shell (lp:unity). This is not a library used in the implementation of the Unity shell itself (lp:unity does not link against it), but a library to be consumed by clients that wants to do deep integration with the Unity shell. Fedora Account System Username: cicku
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=988648
Christopher Meng cickumqt@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends On| |962029
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=988648
--- Comment #1 from Michael Schwendt bugs.michael@gmx.net --- Spec URL: http://cicku.me/libunity.spec SRPM URL: http://cicku.me/libunity-6.12.0-1.fc20.src.rpm
Just a brief look at the spec:
Summary: Unity instrumenting and integration library
Somewhat pedantic, but I only took a look at this ticket because I wanted to know whether "Unity" here is ambiguous. More clear would be
Summary: Instrumenting and integration library for the Unity shell
IMO.
%package devel Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Requiring_Base_Package
%package -n python-%{name} Summary: Python bindings for libunity
Note that the "Requiring Base Package" guidelines are not specific to -devel packages.
%files %{_libdir}/girepository-1.0/*.typelib %{_libdir}/libunity.so.* %{_libdir}/libunity/libunity-protocol-private.so.*
Which package owns %{_libdir}/libunity/?
%files devel %{_libdir}/libunity/libunity-protocol-private.so
Please verify how/when this lib is used. Judging based on its path it seems to be a private plugin/extension lib, which is dlopen()'ed at runtime. Verify whether libunity loads it via the non-versioned *.so name or the versioned one. In that case, this file may need to be moved into the correct package.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=988648
Christopher Meng i@cicku.me changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends On| |1121005
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1121005 [Bug 1121005] dee-1.2.7 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=988648 Bug 988648 depends on bug 1121005, which changed state.
Bug 1121005 Summary: dee-1.2.7 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1121005
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=988648
gil cattaneo puntogil@libero.it changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |201449 (FE-DEADREVIEW)
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=201449 [Bug 201449] FE-DEADREVIEW -- Reviews stalled due to lack of submitter response should be blocking this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=988648
Rex Dieter rdieter@math.unl.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED CC| |rdieter@math.unl.edu Resolution|--- |NOTABUG Last Closed| |2016-01-11 15:24:32
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org