[Bug 2235076] New: Review Request: python-pkginfo2 - API for querying the distutils metadata written in the PKG-INFO file

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235076

            Bug ID: 2235076
           Summary: Review Request: python-pkginfo2 - API for querying the
                    distutils metadata written in the PKG-INFO file
           Product: Fedora
           Version: rawhide
            Status: NEW
         Component: Package Review
          Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
          Reporter: zebob.m(a)gmail.com
        QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
                CC: package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
  Target Milestone: ---
    Classification: Fedora



Spec URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/python-pkginfo2.spec
SRPM URL:
https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/python-pkginfo2-30.0.0-1.fc3...

Description:
This package provides an API for querying the distutils metadata written in the
PKG-INFO file inside a source distriubtion (an sdist) or a binary distribution
or a wheel (e.g., created by running bdist_egg).  It can also query the
EGG-INFO directory of an installed distribution, and the *.egg-info stored in a
"development checkout" (e.g, created by running setup.py develop), or the
*.dist-info from an as-installed package.

Fedora Account System Username: eclipseo

To build it against the dependencies, use the following COPR in your rawhide
mock.cfg:

[copr:copr.fedorainfracloud.org:eclipseo:scancode-toolkit]
name=Copr repo for scancode-toolkit owned by eclipseo
baseurl=https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/eclipseo/scanc...
type=rpm-md
skip_if_unavailable=True
gpgcheck=1
gpgkey=https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/eclipseo/scanco...
repo_gpgcheck=0
enabled=1
enabled_metadata=1


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235076

Report this comment as SPAM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=rep...

[Bug 2235076] Review Request: python-pkginfo2 - API for querying the distutils metadata written in the PKG-INFO file

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235076

Miroslav Suchý <msuchy(a)redhat.com&gt; changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Blocks|                            |2235055 (scancode-toolkit)





Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235055
[Bug 2235055] Review Request: scancode-toolkit - Scan code and detect licenses,
copyrights, and more.
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235076

[Bug 2235076] Review Request: python-pkginfo2 - API for querying the distutils metadata written in the PKG-INFO file

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235076

Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 <zebob.m(a)gmail.com&gt; changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Doc Type|---                         |If docs needed, set a value



--- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 <zebob.m(a)gmail.com&gt; ---
Spec URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/python-pkginfo2.spec
SRPM URL:
https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/python-pkginfo2-30.0.0-1.fc3...


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235076

Report this comment as SPAM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=rep...

[Bug 2235076] Review Request: python-pkginfo2 - API for querying the distutils metadata written in the PKG-INFO file

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235076

Fedora Review Service <fedora-review-bot(a)fedoraproject.org&gt; changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                URL|                            |https://github.com/nexB/pkg
                   |                            |info2



--- Comment #2 from Fedora Review Service <fedora-review-bot(a)fedoraproject.org&gt; ---
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/6532614
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-...

Please take a look if any issues were found.

---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235076

Report this comment as SPAM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=rep...

[Bug 2235076] Review Request: python-pkginfo2 - API for querying the distutils metadata written in the PKG-INFO file

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235076

Miroslav Suchý <msuchy(a)redhat.com&gt; changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |msuchy(a)redhat.com
           Assignee|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org    |msuchy(a)redhat.com




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235076

[Bug 2235076] Review Request: python-pkginfo2 - API for querying the distutils metadata written in the PKG-INFO file

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235076

Miroslav Suchý <msuchy(a)redhat.com&gt; changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Flags|                            |fedora-review+
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED



--- Comment #3 from Miroslav Suchý <msuchy(a)redhat.com&gt; ---
Package Review
==============

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed



===== MUST items =====

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
     names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[-]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
     one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
     license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
     license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: The License field must be a valid SPDX expression.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
     provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
     (~1MB) or number of files.
     Note: Documentation size is 9352 bytes in 3 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

Python:
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
     process.
[-]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
     provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Packages MUST NOT have dependencies (either build-time or runtime) on
     packages named with the unversioned python- prefix unless no properly
     versioned package exists. Dependencies on Python packages instead MUST
     use names beginning with python2- or python3- as appropriate.
[x]: Python packages must not contain %{pythonX_site(lib|arch)}/* in %files

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
     file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
     publishes signatures.
     Note: gpgverify is not used.
[?]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
     files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.



python3-pkginfo2.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary pkginfo2
You should co-operate with upstream and ask for man page. Or write the man page
for them. But I will not block review on this.

APPROVED


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235076

Report this comment as SPAM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=rep...

[Bug 2235076] Review Request: python-pkginfo2 - API for querying the distutils metadata written in the PKG-INFO file

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235076



--- Comment #4 from Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 <zebob.m(a)gmail.com&gt; ---
Thanks a lot!


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235076

Report this comment as SPAM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=rep...

[Bug 2235076] Review Request: python-pkginfo2 - API for querying the distutils metadata written in the PKG-INFO file

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235076



--- Comment #5 from Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions
<fedora-admin-xmlrpc(a)fedoraproject.org&gt; ---
The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-pkginfo2


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235076

Report this comment as SPAM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=rep...

[Bug 2235076] Review Request: python-pkginfo2 - API for querying the distutils metadata written in the PKG-INFO file

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235076

Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org&gt; changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |MODIFIED



--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org&gt; ---
FEDORA-2023-3a704ea589 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 38.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-3a704ea589


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235076

Report this comment as SPAM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=rep...

[Bug 2235076] Review Request: python-pkginfo2 - API for querying the distutils metadata written in the PKG-INFO file

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235076



--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org&gt; ---
FEDORA-2023-39e223138e has been submitted as an update to Fedora 37.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-39e223138e


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235076

Report this comment as SPAM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=rep...

[Bug 2235076] Review Request: python-pkginfo2 - API for querying the distutils metadata written in the PKG-INFO file

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235076



--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org&gt; ---
FEDORA-2023-eba9776735 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 39.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-eba9776735


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235076

Report this comment as SPAM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=rep...

[Bug 2235076] Review Request: python-pkginfo2 - API for querying the distutils metadata written in the PKG-INFO file

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235076

Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org&gt; changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|MODIFIED                    |ON_QA



--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org&gt; ---
FEDORA-2023-eba9776735 has been pushed to the Fedora 39 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh
--advisory=FEDORA-2023-eba9776735 \*`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-eba9776735

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235076

Report this comment as SPAM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=rep...

[Bug 2235076] Review Request: python-pkginfo2 - API for querying the distutils metadata written in the PKG-INFO file

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235076



--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org&gt; ---
FEDORA-2023-3a704ea589 has been pushed to the Fedora 38 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh
--advisory=FEDORA-2023-3a704ea589 \*`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-3a704ea589

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235076

Report this comment as SPAM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=rep...

[Bug 2235076] Review Request: python-pkginfo2 - API for querying the distutils metadata written in the PKG-INFO file

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235076



--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org&gt; ---
FEDORA-2023-39e223138e has been pushed to the Fedora 37 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh
--advisory=FEDORA-2023-39e223138e \*`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-39e223138e

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235076

Report this comment as SPAM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=rep...

[Bug 2235076] Review Request: python-pkginfo2 - API for querying the distutils metadata written in the PKG-INFO file

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235076

Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org&gt; changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ON_QA                       |CLOSED
         Resolution|---                         |ERRATA
        Last Closed|                            |2023-11-07 01:39:13



--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org&gt; ---
FEDORA-2023-eba9776735 has been pushed to the Fedora 39 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235076

Report this comment as SPAM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=rep...

[Bug 2235076] Review Request: python-pkginfo2 - API for querying the distutils metadata written in the PKG-INFO file

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235076



--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org&gt; ---
FEDORA-2023-39e223138e has been pushed to the Fedora 37 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235076

Report this comment as SPAM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=rep...

[Bug 2235076] Review Request: python-pkginfo2 - API for querying the distutils metadata written in the PKG-INFO file

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235076



--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org&gt; ---
FEDORA-2023-3a704ea589 has been pushed to the Fedora 38 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235076

Report this comment as SPAM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=rep...