Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: perl-Sys-MemInfo - returns the total amount of free and used physical memory
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820090
Summary: Review Request: perl-Sys-MemInfo - returns the total amount of free and used physical memory Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jsynacek@redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: notting@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: ---
Spec URL: http://jsynacek.fedorapeople.org/perl-sys-meminfo/perl-Sys-MemInfo.spec SRPM URL: http://jsynacek.fedorapeople.org/perl-sys-meminfo/perl-Sys-MemInfo-0.91-1.fc... Description: Sys::MemInfo return the total amount of free and used physical memory in bytes in totalmem and freemem variables.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820090
Jan Synacek jsynacek@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820090
Jitka Plesnikova jplesnik@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jplesnik@redhat.com
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820090
Jitka Plesnikova jplesnik@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody@fedoraproject.org |jplesnik@redhat.com
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820090
Jitka Plesnikova jplesnik@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820090
Jitka Plesnikova jplesnik@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820090
--- Comment #1 from Jitka Plesnikova jplesnik@redhat.com 2012-05-09 05:04:09 EDT --- Issues:
* file size mismatch Sys-MemInfo-0.91.tar.gz = 6738, http://www.cpan.org/modules/by-module/Sys/Sys-MemInfo-0.91.tar.gz = 6802 * missing BR: perl(Test::More) * invalid license. It should be LGPLv2+
When you fix the issues, I'll continue with review.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820090
--- Comment #2 from Jan Synacek jsynacek@redhat.com 2012-05-09 05:55:11 EDT --- Fixed. Spec and SRPM URLs stay the same.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820090
--- Comment #3 from Jitka Plesnikova jplesnik@redhat.com 2012-05-09 06:24:45 EDT --- * missing BR: perl(Data::Dumper)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820090
--- Comment #4 from Jan Synacek jsynacek@redhat.com 2012-05-09 06:39:20 EDT --- Fixed.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820090
--- Comment #5 from Jitka Plesnikova jplesnik@redhat.com 2012-05-09 10:40:02 EDT --- Package Review ==============
Key: - = N/A x = Pass ! = Fail ? = Not evaluated
==== C/C++ ==== [-]: MUST Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [x]: MUST Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [x]: MUST Package does not contain kernel modules. [x]: MUST Package contains no static executables. [x]: MUST Rpath absent or only used for internal libs. [x]: MUST Package is not relocatable. [!]: MUST Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. Note: perl-Sys-MemInfo-0.91-1.fc18.i686.rpm : /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/auto/Sys/MemInfo/MemInfo.so
==== Generic ==== [x]: MUST Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: MUST Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: MUST %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: MUST All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [!]: MUST Buildroot is not present Note: Buildroot is not needed unless packager plans to package for EPEL5 [x]: MUST Package contains no bundled libraries. [x]: MUST Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: MUST Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) Note: Clean is needed only if supporting EPEL [x]: MUST Sources contain only permissible code or content. [!]: MUST Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4 Note: defattr(....) present in %files section. This is OK if packaging for EPEL5. Otherwise not needed [x]: MUST Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: MUST Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: MUST Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-]: MUST Package is not known to require ExcludeArch. [x]: MUST Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: MUST Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: MUST Spec file lacks Packager, Vendor, PreReq tags. [!]: MUST Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. Note: rm -rf is only needed if supporting EPEL5 [-]: MUST Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x]: MUST If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x]: MUST License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. [x]: MUST Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: MUST Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: MUST Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: MUST Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [x]: MUST Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: MUST Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: MUST Package installs properly. [x]: MUST Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: MUST Rpmlint output is silent.
rpmlint perl-Sys-MemInfo-0.91-1.fc18.i686.rpm
perl-Sys-MemInfo.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US totalmem -> teetotal perl-Sys-MemInfo.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US freemem -> freemen, Freeman, freeman perl-Sys-MemInfo.i686: W: private-shared-object-provides /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/auto/Sys/MemInfo/MemInfo.so MemInfo.so perl-Sys-MemInfo.i686: W: private-shared-object-provides /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/auto/Sys/MemInfo/MemInfo.so MemInfo.so 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings.
rpmlint perl-Sys-MemInfo-0.91-1.fc18.src.rpm
perl-Sys-MemInfo.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US totalmem -> teetotal perl-Sys-MemInfo.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US freemem -> freemen, Freeman, freeman 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
rpmlint perl-Sys-MemInfo-debuginfo-0.91-1.fc18.i686.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
[x]: MUST Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. /home/jplesnik/review/820090/Sys-MemInfo-0.91.tar.gz : MD5SUM this package : d2ddda32c58114352e04ecb866de7f17 MD5SUM upstream package : d2ddda32c58114352e04ecb866de7f17
[x]: MUST Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x]: MUST Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [-]: MUST Package contains a SysV-style init script if in need of one. [x]: MUST File names are valid UTF-8. [-]: MUST Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [x]: SHOULD Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [-]: SHOULD If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: SHOULD Dist tag is present. [x]: SHOULD No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [!]: SHOULD Final provides and requires are sane (rpm -q --provides and rpm -q --requires). [x]: SHOULD Package functions as described. [x]: SHOULD Latest version is packaged. [-]: SHOULD Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [x]: SHOULD SourceX is a working URL. [-]: SHOULD Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x]: SHOULD Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [x]: SHOULD %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: SHOULD Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: SHOULD Spec use %global instead of %define.
Issues: TODO: Add filter "%{?perl_default_filter}" before %description. After that the MemInfo.so will not be added to Provides. It should solve following * [!]: MUST Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. * [!]: MUST Rpmlint output is silent. (The spelling errors could be ignored) * rpm -q --provides will not contain MemInfo.so.
TODO: Removed Buildroot if you don't plan to package for EPEL5 TODO: Remove %clean section if not supporting EPEL TODO: Remove defattr(....) in %files section if not supporting EPEL5. TODO: Remove rm -rf %{buildroot} at the beginning of %install if not supporting EPEL5.
I'll approve the package once the above are fixed.
Generated by fedora-review 0.2.0git External plugins:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820090
--- Comment #6 from Jan Synacek jsynacek@redhat.com 2012-05-10 03:24:09 EDT --- Done.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820090
--- Comment #7 from Jitka Plesnikova jplesnik@redhat.com 2012-05-10 04:38:21 EDT --- perl-Sys-MemInfo.src:29: W: macro-in-comment %{perl_vendorarch} perl-Sys-MemInfo.src:30: W: macro-in-comment %{perl_vendorarch}
Please remove the commented line from %install section (mv, ln).
BTW, if you want to comment out line with rpm macro, you have to add one % before the macro (e.g. %%{perl_vendorarch}).
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820090
--- Comment #8 from Jan Synacek jsynacek@redhat.com 2012-05-10 05:39:28 EDT --- Oh, I'm sorry, that was a hasty change from my side..
It should be ok now.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820090
Jitka Plesnikova jplesnik@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #9 from Jitka Plesnikova jplesnik@redhat.com 2012-05-10 07:02:31 EDT --- Approving now.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820090
Jan Synacek jsynacek@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #10 from Jan Synacek jsynacek@redhat.com 2012-05-10 08:00:29 EDT --- New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Sys-MemInfo Short Description: returns the total amount of free and used physical memory Owners: jsynacek Branches: f16 f17 f18 InitialCC: perl-sig
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820090
--- Comment #11 from Jon Ciesla limburgher@gmail.com 2012-05-10 08:31:52 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests).
Removed f18, that's devel and is automatic.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820090
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820090
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2012-05-10 09:22:15 EDT --- perl-Sys-MemInfo-0.91-1.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Sys-MemInfo-0.91-1.fc16
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820090
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |ON_QA
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2012-05-11 06:33:39 EDT --- perl-Sys-MemInfo-0.91-1.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 testing repository.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820090
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed| |2012-05-29 06:37:12
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- perl-Sys-MemInfo-0.91-1.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820090
Orion Poplawski orion@cora.nwra.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |orion@cora.nwra.com
--- Comment #15 from Orion Poplawski orion@cora.nwra.com --- I need this in EPEL5/6. Jan - do you want to maintain there or shall I?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820090
--- Comment #16 from Jan Synacek jsynacek@redhat.com --- (In reply to comment #15)
I need this in EPEL5/6. Jan - do you want to maintain there or shall I?
Feel free to maintain it there.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820090
Orion Poplawski orion@cora.nwra.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #17 from Orion Poplawski orion@cora.nwra.com --- Will do
Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: perl-Sys-MemInfo New Branches: el5 el6 Owners: orion InitialCC:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820090
--- Comment #18 from Jon Ciesla limburgher@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests).
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820090
Petr Pisar ppisar@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ppisar@redhat.com
--- Comment #19 from Petr Pisar ppisar@redhat.com --- The licensing is not clear for me. See https://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=80636. Thus I changed license tag to cover all possibilites.
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org