Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: django-registration - A user-registration application for Django
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526100
Summary: Review Request: django-registration - A user-registration application for Django Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: michael.silvanus@gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: notting@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora
Spec URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/python/django-registration.spec SRPM URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/python/django-registration-0.7-1.fc12.... Description: This is a fairly simple user-registration application for Django_, designed to make allowing user signups as painless as possible. It requires a functional installation of Django 1.0 or newer, but has no other dependencies.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526100
Thomas Janssen thomasj@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |thomasj@fedoraproject.org AssignedTo|nobody@fedoraproject.org |thomasj@fedoraproject.org Flag| |fedora-review?
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Janssen thomasj@fedoraproject.org 2009-10-03 11:04:16 EDT --- The website from "Url:" has heavy problems right now. Dunno if that's a criteria to wait and get a new url for registration first (hardcoded link), or if it's easily setup after registration via a conf-file. I'm not a py coder.
A koji Task Info link from a scratch build and the rpmlint output would be nice.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526100
Peter Lemenkov lemenkov@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526100
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Janssen thomasj@fedoraproject.org 2009-10-29 07:13:19 EDT --- Ping?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526100
Cristian Ciupitu cristian.ciupitu@yahoo.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cristian.ciupitu@yahoo.com
--- Comment #3 from Cristian Ciupitu cristian.ciupitu@yahoo.com 2010-04-13 20:16:12 EDT --- Yet another ping.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526100
Arun SAG sagarun@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sagarun@gmail.com
--- Comment #4 from Arun SAG sagarun@gmail.com 2011-01-05 13:33:34 EST --- ping. I intend to use this package for my personal project, I'd like to see this in Fedora. If the submitter is OK i am ready to take this package.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526100
Cristian Ciupitu cristian.ciupitu@yahoo.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(michel+fdr@sylves | |tre.me)
--- Comment #5 from Cristian Ciupitu cristian.ciupitu@yahoo.com 2011-01-05 15:48:37 EST --- I need this package as well because Satchmo[1] depends on it. I'm not a sponsor, but I'll gladly review the SPEC once it's clear who's the packager.
[1] http://www.satchmoproject.com/
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526100
Jason Tibbitts tibbs@math.uh.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Blocks| |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution| |NOTABUG Flag|fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(michel+fdr@sylves | |tre.me) | Last Closed| |2011-01-05 15:59:05
--- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts tibbs@math.uh.edu 2011-01-05 15:59:05 EST --- At this point I'd suggest that anyone else who wishes to submit this package simply do so in a new ticket and mark this one as a duplicate. This ticket should have been closed due to inactivity ages ago.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526100
Praveen Kumar kumarpraveen.nitdgp@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kumarpraveen.nitdgp@gmail.c | |om Resolution|NOTABUG |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #7 from Praveen Kumar kumarpraveen.nitdgp@gmail.com 2011-08-06 08:49:30 EDT ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 728691 ***
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org