[Bug 470179] New: Review Request: perl-MooseX-App-Cmd - Mashes up MooseX::Getopt and App::Cmd
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: perl-MooseX-App-Cmd - Mashes up MooseX::Getopt and App::Cmd Alias: perl-MooseX-App-Cmd
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470179
Summary: Review Request: perl-MooseX-App-Cmd - Mashes up MooseX::Getopt and App::Cmd Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/MooseX-App-Cmd OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl@alumni.drew.edu QAContact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: notting@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora
Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-MooseX-App-Cmd.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-MooseX-App-Cmd-0.04-1.fc9.src.rpm
Description: This module marries the App::Cmd manpage with the MooseX::Getopt manpage.
Use it like the App::Cmd manpage advises (especially see the App::Cmd::Tutorial manpage), swapping the App::Cmd::Command manpage for the MooseX::App::Cmd::Command manpage.
Then you can write your moose commands as moose classes, with the MooseX::Getopt manpage defining the options for you instead of 'opt_spec' returning a the Getopt::Long::Descriptive manpage spec.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470179
Chris Weyl cweyl@alumni.drew.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |470178, 469627, 469816
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470179
--- Comment #1 from Chris Weyl cweyl@alumni.drew.edu 2008-11-06 02:16:27 EDT --- I swear I fixed those "manpage" references in the %description.
Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-MooseX-App-Cmd.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-MooseX-App-Cmd-0.04-2.fc9.src.rpm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470179
manuel wolfshant wolfy@nobugconsulting.ro changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody@fedoraproject.org |wolfy@nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review+
Bug 470179 depends on bug 469627, which changed state.
Bug 469627 Summary: Review Request: perl-MooseX-Types-Path-Class - A Path::Class type library for Moose https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469627
What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED
Bug 470179 depends on bug 469816, which changed state.
Bug 469816 Summary: Review Request: perl-App-Cmd - Write command line apps with less suffering https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469816
What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED
--- Comment #2 from manuel wolfshant wolfy@nobugconsulting.ro 2008-11-27 23:11:20 EDT --- Package Review ==============
Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated
=== REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines including the Perl specific items [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: source RPM: empty binary RPM:empty [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPL+ or Artistic [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: 385e09b2d525502c4edc0eda3a0de24e3f3e2079 MooseX-App-Cmd-0.04.tar.gz [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
=== SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [?] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: noarch, perl module [?] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. [!] %check is present and the test passes. -> see Note 1
Note 1: The build logs says a test has failed with t/basic.................Can't locate Test/Output.pm in @INC (@INC contains: t/lib /builddir/build/BUILD/MooseX-App-Cmd-0.04/blib/lib /builddir/build/BUILD/MooseX-App-Cmd-0.04/blib/arch /usr/lib64/perl5/5.10.0/x86_64-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/5.10.0 /usr/local/lib64/perl5/site_perl/5.10.0/x86_64-linux-thread-multi /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.10.0 /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/x86_64-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl /usr/local/lib64/perl5/site_perl) at t/basic.t line 81.
Please add perl(Test::Output) as BuildRequires to fix that. I have just checked locally and make test is happy after that.
================ *** APPROVED *** but fix the missing BR before commit ================
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470179
--- Comment #3 from Chris Weyl cweyl@alumni.drew.edu 2008-11-28 14:32:39 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2)
Please add perl(Test::Output) as BuildRequires to fix that. I have just checked locally and make test is happy after that.
================
*** APPROVED *** but fix the missing BR before commit
Will do. Thanks for the review! :-)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470179
--- Comment #4 from Chris Weyl cweyl@alumni.drew.edu 2008-11-28 14:32:49 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-MooseX-App-Cmd Short Description: Mashes up MooseX::Getopt and App::Cmd Owners: cweyl Branches: F-9 F-10 devel InitialCC: perl-sig
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470179
Chris Weyl cweyl@alumni.drew.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470179
Kevin Fenzi kevin@tummy.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi kevin@tummy.com 2008-12-01 16:24:21 EDT --- cvs done.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470179
Chris Weyl cweyl@alumni.drew.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE
Bug 470179 depends on bug 470178, which changed state.
Bug 470178 Summary: Review Request: perl-MooseX-ConfigFromFile - An abstract Moose role for setting attributes from a configfile https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470178
What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
-
Red Hat Bugzilla