[Bug 225981] New: Merge Review: lcms

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225981

Summary: Merge Review: lcms
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: [e-mail]
        ReportedBy: [e-mail]
         QAContact: [e-mail]
                CC: [e-mail]

Fedora Merge Review: lcms

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/lcms/
Initial Owner: [e-mail]

[Bug 225981] Merge Review: lcms

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: lcms

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225981

[e-mail] changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|[e-mail]    |[e-mail]
               Flag|                            |fedora-review?

------- Additional Comments From [e-mail]  2007-02-04 07:27 EST -------
should be quick as it is coming from Extras originally :-)

[Bug 225981] Merge Review: lcms

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: lcms

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225981

[e-mail] changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|[e-mail]                |[e-mail]
                 CC|                            |[e-mail]
               Flag|fedora-review?              |fedora-review-

------- Additional Comments From [e-mail]  2007-02-04 08:19 EST -------
OK	source files match upstream:
        930ef7de15eb028c1cdbfe3f1170aaa1d5b0b4d45a8fa496d944216e155122c2 
lcms-1.15.tar.gz
OK	package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
OK	specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
OK	dist tag is present.
OK	build root is correct.
OK	license is open source-compatible. License text included in package.
OK	latest version is being packaged.
OK	BuildRequires are proper.
OK	compiler flags are appropriate.
OK	%clean is present.
OK	package builds in mock (i386).
OK	package installs properly
OK	debuginfo package looks complete.
OK	final provides and requires are sane:
OK	shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths, ldconfig is run.
OK	owns the directories it creates.
OK	doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
OK	no duplicates in %files.
OK	file permissions are appropriate.
OK	scriptlets are present and they are sane.
OK	code, not content.
OK	documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
OK	%docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
OK	headers in devel subpackage.
OK	pkgconfig filesin devel subpackage.
OK	no libtool .la are packaged.
OK	not a GUI app.

MUST FIX:

BAD	license field does NOT match the actual license.

The License tag contains LGPL, but the license in the COPYING file and in the
source files headers is different. The Web say it is MIT license.

SHOULD FIX:

BAD	 rpmlint is NOT silent.

I: lcms checking
E: lcms zero-length /usr/share/doc/lcms-1.15/ChangeLog
    the ChangeLog could be omited

I: python-lcms checking
W: python-lcms summary-ended-with-dot Python interface to LittleCMS.

Also a newer version 1.16 was already released.

[Bug 225981] Merge Review: lcms

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: lcms

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225981

------- Additional Comments From [e-mail]  2007-02-04 08:23 EST -------
Created an attachment (id=147300)
 --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=147300&action=vie...)
patch to fix the discussed issues

[Bug 225981] Merge Review: lcms

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: lcms

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225981

------- Additional Comments From [e-mail]  2007-02-04 10:34 EST -------
> Requires:       python, %{python_sitearch}

The automatic "python(abi) = ..." dep should suffice. Path deps make
Yum download the extra filelists, which is unnecessary in this case.
> touch ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{python_sitearch}/lcms.py{c,o}
> %ghost %{python_sitearch}/lcms.py?

We no longer %ghost compiled Python files.
> %{_libdir}/*.a

Static libs can go, right?

[Bug 225981] Merge Review: lcms

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: lcms

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225981

[e-mail] changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |[e-mail]

------- Additional Comments From [e-mail]  2007-02-05 08:06 EST -------
All comments fixed in 1.16-1.

Also, this was once an extras package that moved to core due to f-spot requiring
it. I'll gladly give it back to whoever else wants to maintain it. Michael,
you're latest in the changelog. Are you interested?

[Bug 225981] Merge Review: lcms

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: lcms

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225981

------- Additional Comments From [e-mail]  2007-02-05 09:16 EST -------
No particular interest. I've never been a maintainer of lcms, just
a bug-fix grunt.

[Bug 225981] Merge Review: lcms

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: lcms

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225981

[e-mail] changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|[e-mail]            |[e-mail]
               Flag|fedora-review-              |fedora-review?

------- Additional Comments From [e-mail]  2007-02-07 04:24 EST -------
Did not you forget to fix the Requires in the python subpackage from comment #4?
I agree with Michael on this.

It looks like the new sources have a new feature - almost all files have the
exec bit set. Please, unset it at least from *.c and *.h files that are packaged
into the -debug subpackage.

find . -name *.[ch] | xargs chmod -x

[Bug 225981] Merge Review: lcms

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: lcms

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225981

------- Additional Comments From [e-mail]  2007-02-08 06:17 EST -------
Fixed in 1.16-3.

[Bug 225981] Merge Review: lcms

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: lcms

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225981

[e-mail] changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+

------- Additional Comments From [e-mail]  2007-02-09 03:28 EST -------
I don't see any other problems, so this package is APPROVED.

[Bug 225981] Merge Review: lcms

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: lcms

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225981

[e-mail] changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|[e-mail]                |[e-mail]

[Bug 225981] Merge Review: lcms

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: lcms

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225981

[e-mail] changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Severity|normal                      |medium
           Priority|normal                      |medium

[e-mail] changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|                            |fedora-cvs?

------- Additional Comments From [e-mail]  2007-05-15 03:47 EST -------
Package Change Request
======================
Package Name: lcms
Updated Fedora Owners: [e-mail], [e-mail]

Handing over lcms maintainership.

[Bug 225981] Merge Review: lcms

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: lcms

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225981

[e-mail] changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |[e-mail]

------- Additional Comments From [e-mail]  2007-05-15 12:51 EST -------
Thx for doing this!

For now i haven't seen a FC-6 branch when doing cvs co lcms
I would like to update FC-6 from current devel (with no changes since this will
lead to broken upgrade path...)

Do adread agree with this ? 
(I explain that it is safe here : https://bugzilla.redhat.com/236067 )
lcsm 0.16 is also marked stable on their website...

Should we ask for package maintainers to confirm and/or test a 0.16 package for
lcms ? I don't think that is necessary...

1.17 is unstable for now and i will work on it after F7 is out... (for F8 rawhide)

[Bug 225981] Merge Review: lcms

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: lcms

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225981

[e-mail] changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|fedora-cvs?                 |fedora-cvs+

[Bug 225981] Merge Review: lcms

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: lcms

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225981

[e-mail] changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Product|Fedora Extras               |Fedora

[e-mail] changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |CURRENTRELEASE

------- Additional Comments From [e-mail]  2007-08-10 16:44 EST -------
This review is done.