[Bug 1177550] New: Review Request: nodejs-archiver - a streaming interface for archive generation - package-review

List overview All Threads
Download

newer

[Bug 1177550] New: Review Request: nodejs-archiver - a streaming interface for archive generation

older

[Bug 1294841] New: Review Request:...

[Bug 1064657] New: Review Request:...

Red Hat Bugzilla

28 Dec 2014 28 Dec '14

5:14 p.m.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177550

Bug ID: 1177550 Summary: Review Request: nodejs-archiver - a streaming interface for archive generation Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nobody@fedoraproject.org Reporter: piotr1212@gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

Spec URL: https://piotrp.fedorapeople.org/nodejs-archiver.spec SRPM URL: https://piotrp.fedorapeople.org/nodejs-archiver-0.13.0-1.fc21.src.rpm Description: a streaming interface for archive generation Fedora Account System Username: piotrp

-- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

Show replies by date

Red Hat Bugzilla

28 Dec 28 Dec

5:17 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 1177550] Review Request: nodejs-archiver - a streaming interface for archive generation

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177550

Piotr Popieluch piotr1212@gmail.com changed:

Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1082298 [Bug 1082298] nodejs-async-0.9.0 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1082401 [Bug 1082401] Review Request: nodejs-lazystream - Create streams lazily when they are read from or written to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1176882 [Bug 1176882] Review Request: nodejs-tar-stream - A streaming tar parser and generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1176896 [Bug 1176896] Review Request: nodejs-zip-stream - A streaming zip archive generator

-- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

Red Hat Bugzilla

29 Dec 29 Dec

12:17 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 1177550] Review Request: nodejs-archiver - a streaming interface for archive generation

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177550 Bug 1177550 depends on bug 1082401, which changed state.

Bug 1082401 Summary: Review Request: nodejs-lazystream - Create streams lazily when they are read from or written to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1082401

-- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

Red Hat Bugzilla

31 Dec 31 Dec

12:01 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 1177550] Review Request: nodejs-archiver - a streaming interface for archive generation

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177550 Bug 1177550 depends on bug 1176896, which changed state.

Bug 1176896 Summary: Review Request: nodejs-zip-stream - A streaming zip archive generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1176896

-- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

Red Hat Bugzilla

12:17 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 1177550] Review Request: nodejs-archiver - a streaming interface for archive generation

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177550 Bug 1177550 depends on bug 1176882, which changed state.

Bug 1176882 Summary: Review Request: nodejs-tar-stream - A streaming tar parser and generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1176882

-- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

Red Hat Bugzilla

27 Feb 27 Feb

6:10 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 1177550] Review Request: nodejs-archiver - a streaming interface for archive generation

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177550

Piotr Popieluch piotr1212@gmail.com changed:

What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |956806 (nodejs-reviews)

Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956806 [Bug 956806] Node.js Review Tracker

-- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

Red Hat Bugzilla

8 Mar 8 Mar

11:56 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 1177550] Review Request: nodejs-archiver - a streaming interface for archive generation

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177550

--- Comment #1 from Piotr Popieluch piotr1212@gmail.com --- Spec URL: https://piotrp.fedorapeople.org/nodejs-archiver.spec SRPM URL: https://piotrp.fedorapeople.org/nodejs-archiver-0.14.3-1.fc21.src.rpm

Updated to latest upstream. Tests fails, package needs nodejs-async 0.9

-- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

Red Hat Bugzilla

11:57 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 1177550] Review Request: nodejs-archiver - a streaming interface for archive generation

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177550

Piotr Popieluch piotr1212@gmail.com changed:

What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends On| |1199820

Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199820 [Bug 1199820] Review Request: nodejs-yauzl - Yet another unzip library for node

-- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

Red Hat Bugzilla

23 May 23 May

1:04 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 1177550] Review Request: nodejs-archiver - a streaming interface for archive generation

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177550

Zuzana Svetlikova zsvetlik@redhat.com changed:

--- Comment #2 from Zuzana Svetlikova zsvetlik@redhat.com --- Several comments:

- there's new upstream release - missing multiple BuildRequires for both dependencies and devDependencies - BuildRequires for dependencies shouldn't be inside conditional - missing %{?nodejs_find_provides_and_requires} macro - different URL listed on npmjs (although it redirects, you should probably change it) - incompatible dependencies and devDependencies versions are fixed by %nodejs_fixdep macro (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Patches/PackagingDrafts/NodeJS#Correcting...) - missing devDependencies aren't really blocking build since they're used for tests (plus stream-bench is also missing from repositories) - Summary should start with capital letter

-- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

Red Hat Bugzilla

13 Jun 13 Jun

2:44 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 1177550] Review Request: nodejs-archiver - a streaming interface for archive generation

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177550

--- Comment #3 from Piotr Popieluch piotr1212@gmail.com --- - Update to upstream 0.14.4 - Added el6 macro - Updated URL - Capitalized summary

Spec URL: https://piotrp.fedorapeople.org/nodejs-archiver.spec SRPM URL: https://piotrp.fedorapeople.org/nodejs-node-archiver-0.14.4-1.fc22.src.rpm

-- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

Red Hat Bugzilla

15 Jun 15 Jun

9:14 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 1177550] Review Request: nodejs-archiver - a streaming interface for archive generation

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177550

Zuzana Svetlikova zsvetlik@redhat.com changed:

What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |fedora-review?

--- Comment #4 from Zuzana Svetlikova zsvetlik@redhat.com --- Are you going to package stream-bench too or are you leaving the tests off?

Current github version is 0.15.0 and you should probably change srcname to archiver, since node-archiver is a different module.

Package Review ==============

Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed

Issues: ======= - Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. Note: nodejs-archiver.spec should be nodejs-node-archiver.spec See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Spec_file_name

===== MUST items =====

Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [ ]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: There is no build directory. Running licensecheck on vanilla upstream sources. No licenses found. Please check the source files for licenses manually. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [ ]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 3 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic: [x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [x]: Package functions as described. [ ]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [-]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic: [!]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Note: Bad spec filename: /home/kash/reviews/1177550-nodejs-archiver /srpm-unpacked/nodejs-archiver.spec See: (this test has no URL) [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).

Rpmlint ------- Checking: nodejs-node-archiver-0.14.4-1.fc22.noarch.rpm nodejs-node-archiver-0.14.4-1.fc22.src.rpm nodejs-node-archiver.noarch: W: summary-not-capitalized C a streaming interface for archive generation nodejs-node-archiver.noarch: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib nodejs-node-archiver.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/lib/node_modules/node-archiver/node_modules/lodash /usr/lib/node_modules/lodash nodejs-node-archiver.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/lib/node_modules/node-archiver/node_modules/zip-stream /usr/lib/node_modules/zip-stream nodejs-node-archiver.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/lib/node_modules/node-archiver/node_modules/glob /usr/lib/node_modules/glob nodejs-node-archiver.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/lib/node_modules/node-archiver/node_modules/buffer-crc32 /usr/lib/node_modules/buffer-crc32 nodejs-node-archiver.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/lib/node_modules/node-archiver/node_modules/readable-stream /usr/lib/node_modules/readable-stream nodejs-node-archiver.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/lib/node_modules/node-archiver/node_modules/lazystream /usr/lib/node_modules/lazystream nodejs-node-archiver.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/lib/node_modules/node-archiver/node_modules/async /usr/lib/node_modules/async nodejs-node-archiver.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/lib/node_modules/node-archiver/node_modules/tar-stream /usr/lib/node_modules/tar-stream nodejs-node-archiver.src: W: summary-not-capitalized C a streaming interface for archive generation nodejs-node-archiver.src: E: invalid-spec-name 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 11 warnings.

Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- nodejs-node-archiver.noarch: W: summary-not-capitalized C a streaming interface for archive generation nodejs-node-archiver.noarch: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib nodejs-node-archiver.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/lib/node_modules/node-archiver/node_modules/lodash /usr/lib/node_modules/lodash nodejs-node-archiver.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/lib/node_modules/node-archiver/node_modules/zip-stream /usr/lib/node_modules/zip-stream nodejs-node-archiver.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/lib/node_modules/node-archiver/node_modules/glob /usr/lib/node_modules/glob nodejs-node-archiver.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/lib/node_modules/node-archiver/node_modules/buffer-crc32 /usr/lib/node_modules/buffer-crc32 nodejs-node-archiver.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/lib/node_modules/node-archiver/node_modules/readable-stream /usr/lib/node_modules/readable-stream nodejs-node-archiver.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/lib/node_modules/node-archiver/node_modules/lazystream /usr/lib/node_modules/lazystream nodejs-node-archiver.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/lib/node_modules/node-archiver/node_modules/async /usr/lib/node_modules/async nodejs-node-archiver.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/lib/node_modules/node-archiver/node_modules/tar-stream /usr/lib/node_modules/tar-stream 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 10 warnings.

Requires -------- nodejs-node-archiver (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): nodejs(engine) npm(async) npm(buffer-crc32) npm(glob) npm(lazystream) npm(lodash) npm(readable-stream) npm(tar-stream) npm(zip-stream)

Provides -------- nodejs-node-archiver: nodejs-node-archiver npm(archiver)

Source checksums ---------------- https://github.com/archiverjs/node-archiver/archive/1e55f081f0ad96622990da01... : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : 039700f2931e71254514549facbfccbc616016d5e5a7763404008777094cad71 CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 039700f2931e71254514549facbfccbc616016d5e5a7763404008777094cad71

Generated by fedora-review 0.6.0 (3c5c9d7) last change: 2015-05-20 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 1177550 Buildroot used: fedora-22-x86_64 Active plugins: Generic, Shell-api Disabled plugins: Java, C/C++, Python, fonts, SugarActivity, Ocaml, Perl, Haskell, R, PHP, Ruby Disabled flags: EXARCH, DISTTAG, EPEL5, BATCH, EPEL6

-- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

Red Hat Bugzilla

1:17 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 1177550] Review Request: nodejs-archiver - a streaming interface for archive generation

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177550

--- Comment #5 from Piotr Popieluch piotr1212@gmail.com --- I've messed up the names when switching from node to github source.

correct nodejs name is archiver rpm package name should be nodejs-archiver github project name is node-archiver

fixed it now.

Not really sure about packaging stream-bench, it seems a bit dead, last commit from two years ago and hardly any downloads. Could we leave tests off for now?

Spec URL: https://piotrp.fedorapeople.org/nodejs-archiver.spec SRPM URL: https://piotrp.fedorapeople.org/nodejs-archiver-0.14.4-2.fc22.src.rpm

-- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

Red Hat Bugzilla

1:19 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 1177550] Review Request: nodejs-archiver - a streaming interface for archive generation

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177550

--- Comment #6 from Piotr Popieluch piotr1212@gmail.com --- PS 0.15 seems to be a pre-release

-- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

Red Hat Bugzilla

16 Jun 16 Jun

6:57 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 1177550] Review Request: nodejs-archiver - a streaming interface for archive generation

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177550

Zuzana Svetlikova zsvetlik@redhat.com changed:

What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+

--- Comment #7 from Zuzana Svetlikova zsvetlik@redhat.com --- Seems fine now, APPROVED.

-- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

Red Hat Bugzilla

1:50 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 1177550] Review Request: nodejs-archiver - a streaming interface for archive generation

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177550

Piotr Popieluch piotr1212@gmail.com changed:

What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |fedora-cvs?

--- Comment #8 from Piotr Popieluch piotr1212@gmail.com --- New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: nodejs-archiver Short Description: A streaming interface for archive generation Upstream URL: https://github.com/archiverjs/node-archiver Owners: piotrp Branches: f21 f22 el6 epel7

-- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

Red Hat Bugzilla

2:51 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 1177550] Review Request: nodejs-archiver - a streaming interface for archive generation

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177550

Jon Ciesla limburgher@gmail.com changed:

What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+

-- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

Red Hat Bugzilla

2:51 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 1177550] Review Request: nodejs-archiver - a streaming interface for archive generation

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177550

--- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla limburgher@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

Red Hat Bugzilla

3:37 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 1177550] Review Request: nodejs-archiver - a streaming interface for archive generation

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177550

Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:

What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED

-- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

Red Hat Bugzilla

3:37 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 1177550] Review Request: nodejs-archiver - a streaming interface for archive generation

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177550

--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- nodejs-archiver-0.14.4-2.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nodejs-archiver-0.14.4-2.fc21

-- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

Red Hat Bugzilla

3:38 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 1177550] Review Request: nodejs-archiver - a streaming interface for archive generation

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177550

--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- nodejs-archiver-0.14.4-2.fc22 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 22. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nodejs-archiver-0.14.4-2.fc22

-- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

Red Hat Bugzilla

20 Jun 20 Jun

7:15 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 1177550] Review Request: nodejs-archiver - a streaming interface for archive generation

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177550

Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:

What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |ON_QA

--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- nodejs-archiver-0.14.4-2.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 testing repository.

-- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

Red Hat Bugzilla

3 Jul 3 Jul

1:45 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 1177550] Review Request: nodejs-archiver - a streaming interface for archive generation

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177550

Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:

--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- nodejs-archiver-0.14.4-2.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 stable repository.

-- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

Red Hat Bugzilla

1:52 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 1177550] Review Request: nodejs-archiver - a streaming interface for archive generation

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177550

Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:

--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- nodejs-archiver-0.14.4-2.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository.

-- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

Red Hat Bugzilla

21 Nov 21 Nov

5:17 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 1177550] Review Request: nodejs-archiver - a streaming interface for archive generation

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177550 Bug 1177550 depends on bug 1082298, which changed state.

Bug 1082298 Summary: nodejs-async-1.5.0 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1082298

-- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

Red Hat Bugzilla

9 Mar 9 Mar

9:53 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 1177550] Review Request: nodejs-archiver - a streaming interface for archive generation

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177550 Bug 1177550 depends on bug 1199820, which changed state.

Bug 1199820 Summary: Review Request: nodejs-yauzl - Yet another unzip library for node https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199820

-- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

3534

Age (days ago)

3971

Last active (days ago)

package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

24 comments

1 participants

tags (0)

participants (1)

Red Hat Bugzilla