https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1925223
Bug ID: 1925223 Summary: Review Request: R-cachem - Cache R Objects with Automatic Pruning Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nobody@fedoraproject.org Reporter: spotrh@gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora
Spec URL: https://spot.fedorapeople.org/R-cachem.spec SRPM URL: https://spot.fedorapeople.org/R-cachem-1.0.2-1.fc33.src.rpm Description: Key-value stores with automatic pruning. Caches can limit either their total size or the age of the oldest object (or both), automatically pruning objects to maintain the constraints. Fedora Account System Username: spot
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1925223
Tom "spot" Callaway spotrh@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
--- Comment #1 from Tom "spot" Callaway spotrh@gmail.com --- Needed to update R-memoise
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1925223
José Matos jamatos@fc.up.pt changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jamatos@fc.up.pt Assignee|nobody@fedoraproject.org |jamatos@fc.up.pt Flags| |fedora-review+
--- Comment #2 from José Matos jamatos@fc.up.pt --- The license is correct and appropriated for Fedora. The spec file is simple and correct.
fedora-review complains: - Package have the default element marked as %%doc :DESCRIPTION - Package requires R-core. - If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. Note: License file LICENSE is not marked as %license See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging- guidelines/LicensingGuidelines/#_license_text
The last one can also be ignored since the file LICENSE it is not a license. :-)
Recycling from a previous review "After reviewing so many packages the other thing that shows up is that probably the %install section could get a macro on R-rpm-macros since this chunk appears so many times:
mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{rlibdir} %{_bindir}/R CMD INSTALL -l %{buildroot}%{rlibdir} %{packname} test -d %{packname}/src && (cd %{packname}/src; rm -f *.o *.so) rm -f %{buildroot}%{rlibdir}/R.css "
In this case the chunk is similar: mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir}/R/library %{_bindir}/R CMD INSTALL -l $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir}/R/library %{packname} test -d %{packname}/src && (cd %{packname}/src; rm -f *.o *.so) rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir}/R/library/R.css
I should probably submit a patch to R-rpm-macros since this is tedious and repetitive. :-)
The package is approved.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1925223
--- Comment #3 from Mohan Boddu mboddu@bhujji.com --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/R-cachem
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1925223
Tom "spot" Callaway spotrh@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed| |2021-02-08 20:49:43
--- Comment #4 from Tom "spot" Callaway spotrh@gmail.com --- In rawhide.
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org