Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: gnu-smalltalk - GNU Smalltalk
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174377
------- Additional Comments From bonzini@gnu.org 2006-11-28 02:30 EST ------- I can reply as far as the upstream package is concerned...
- %install section
- Fix broken Shebangs (Please see "timestamp" section below for this).
Should not be necessary anymore.
- *.st files Well, actually I first saw this utility so I don't quite know how to use this package, however, are these *.st really required for 'minimal' use of smalltalk? Or are these somewhat 'add-on' files for smalltalk? (The judgment as of what is 'minimal' use is up to you.)
They are needed to load the optional packages (e.g. sockets, GUI bindings, ...).
- /usr/share/gnu-smalltalk/unsupported/binary.c rpmlint complains about this file as 'devel-file-in-non-devel-package'. Would you explain why this file should be in main package?
I'm going to remove this from the upstream package too.
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org