Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226508
Summary: Merge Review: tvtime Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: nobody@fedoraproject.org QAContact: fedora-package-review@redhat.com CC: than@redhat.com
Fedora Merge Review: tvtime
http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/tvtime/ Initial Owner: than@redhat.com
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226508
Lucian Langa cooly@gnome.eu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cooly@gnome.eu.org
--- Comment #1 from Lucian Langa cooly@gnome.eu.org 2008-12-11 01:39:01 EDT --- Rpmlint is not silent:
tvtime.src: W: patch-not-applied Patch0: tvtime-0.9.13-pie.patch tvtime.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/share/locale/sv/LC_MESSAGES/tvtime.mo 0775 tvtime.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/man/es/man1/tvtime-scanner.1.gz tvtime.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/share/locale/de/LC_MESSAGES/tvtime.mo 0775 tvtime.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/bin/tvtime 0775 tvtime.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/share/locale/nl/LC_MESSAGES/tvtime.mo 0775 tvtime.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/share/locale/ru/LC_MESSAGES/tvtime.mo 0775 tvtime.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/share/locale/ko/LC_MESSAGES/tvtime.mo 0775 tvtime.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/share/locale/cs/LC_MESSAGES/tvtime.mo 0775 tvtime.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/share/locale/nn/LC_MESSAGES/tvtime.mo 0775 tvtime.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/man/es/man5/stationlist.xml.5.gz tvtime.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/man/es/man1/tvtime.1.gz tvtime.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/share/locale/pt/LC_MESSAGES/tvtime.mo 0775 tvtime.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/man/es/man1/tvtime-configure.1.gz tvtime.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/share/locale/es/LC_MESSAGES/tvtime.mo 0775 tvtime.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/man/es/man5/tvtime.xml.5.gz tvtime.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/tvtime-1.0.2/AUTHORS tvtime.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/share/locale/hu/LC_MESSAGES/tvtime.mo 0775 tvtime.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/share/locale/fr/LC_MESSAGES/tvtime.mo 0775 tvtime.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/share/locale/fi/LC_MESSAGES/tvtime.mo 0775 tvtime.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/share/locale/pl/LC_MESSAGES/tvtime.mo 0775
Consider also using the standard sourceforge url in Source: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#Sourceforge.net
Please use default %defattr in %files %defattr(-, root, root, -)
Please see desktop file install: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#desktop-file-install_usag...
desktop file needs some work net-tvtime.desktop: warning: key "Encoding" in group "Desktop Entry" is deprecated net-tvtime.desktop: warning: value "tvtime.png" for key "Icon" in group "Desktop Entry" is an icon name with an extension, but there should be no extension as described in the Icon Theme Specification if the value is not an absolute path net-tvtime.desktop: warning: value "Application;AudioVideo;" for key "Categories" in group "Desktop Entry" contains a deprecated value "Application"
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226508
Jussi Lehtola jussi.lehtola@iki.fi changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jussi.lehtola@iki.fi AssignedTo|nobody@fedoraproject.org |jussi.lehtola@iki.fi Flag| |fedora-review?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226508
--- Comment #2 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.lehtola@iki.fi 2009-05-17 15:31:51 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=344353) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=344353) Patch to fix desktop file install and rpmlint warnings
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226508
Jussi Lehtola jussi.lehtola@iki.fi changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|than@redhat.com |karsten@redhat.com, | |tsmetana@redhat.com
--- Comment #3 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.lehtola@iki.fi 2009-05-17 15:34:59 EDT --- Apply the patch above to devel branch and make build; then I'll do a full review.
Also, please fix the source URL: prdownloads.sourceforge.net should be downloads.sourceforge.net
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226508
--- Comment #4 from Tomas Smetana tsmetana@redhat.com 2009-06-01 02:48:51 EDT --- I've committed some changes to the devel branch: rpmlint seems to be silent now. I used only part of the diff you posted here.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226508
--- Comment #5 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.lehtola@iki.fi 2009-06-01 03:30:04 EDT --- Okay.
- I wouldn't ship man as %doc.
- Change BuildRequires: /usr/bin/desktop-file-install to BuildRequires: desktop-file-utils
- You need to conserve time stamps in character set conversion, use for i in AUTHORS docs/man/{de,es}/*.?; do iconv -f iso-8859-1 -t utf-8 "$i" > "${i}_" && \ touch -r "$i" "${i}_" && \ mv "${i}_" "$i" done This is also safe, since it fails if a command is not completed OK.
- I'm wondering if autoreconfing is really needed; you could just use the trick at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Removing_Rpath
- Why is clean commented out?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226508
--- Comment #6 from Tomas Smetana tsmetana@redhat.com 2009-06-01 03:48:49 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5)
Okay.
- I wouldn't ship man as %doc.
This is something I couldn't find in the guidelines so I didn't change what I inherited. Both make sense to me.
- Change
BuildRequires: /usr/bin/desktop-file-install to BuildRequires: desktop-file-utils
- You need to conserve time stamps in character set conversion, use
for i in AUTHORS docs/man/{de,es}/*.?; do iconv -f iso-8859-1 -t utf-8 "$i" > "${i}_" && \ touch -r "$i" "${i}_" && \ mv "${i}_" "$i" done This is also safe, since it fails if a command is not completed OK.
Right. Will do.
- I'm wondering if autoreconfing is really needed; you could just use the trick
at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Removing_Rpath
This is due to the new ALSA mixer patch and libtoolize. I think it's simpler like this.
- Why is clean commented out?
Because I'm an idiot and don't check what I commit carefully. (It's a remain of debugging the new libtool issue.)
Thanks for your help. I will incorporate the changes to the spec file, rebuild and update this bugzilla.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226508
--- Comment #7 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.lehtola@iki.fi 2009-06-01 04:19:01 EDT --- Okay, once you have built the new revision in rawhide I will do the full review.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226508
--- Comment #8 from Tomas Smetana tsmetana@redhat.com 2009-06-01 04:29:50 EDT --- Done. Hope it's better this time. Maybe even good.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226508
--- Comment #9 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.lehtola@iki.fi 2009-06-01 08:40:10 EDT --- rpmlint output is clean.
MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used consistently. NEEDSWORK - You are using %{buildroot} and $RPM_OPT_FLAGS, please change the latter to %{optflags}.
MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. OK
MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK - Some files are MIT licensed (e.g. src/xfullscreen.{c,h}), but MIT license is compatible with GPL/LGPL. - Also LGPL is compatible with GPL, so license tag could in principle be just GPLv2+. - Current GPLv2+ and LGPLv2+ is most informative, so it's best to keep it as it is.
MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. OK MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. OK
MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. NEEDSWORK - Time stamps are not conserved in install, add INSTALL="install -p" as argument to make install.
MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. N/A
MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package that owns the directory. NEEDSWORK - Package must Requires: hicolor-icon-theme for dir ownership. (no Requires(post): and Requires(postun): hicolor-icon-theme, should be just Requires: hicolor-icon-theme).
MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK MUST: Debuginfo package is complete. OK
MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. NEEDSWORK - I don't think directories can be listed as config. I'd change %config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/tvtime/ to %dir %{_sysconfdir}/tvtime/ %config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/tvtime/tvtime.xml
MUST: Clean section exists. OK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. N/A MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect runtime of application. NEEDSWORK - Include COPYING.LGPL.
MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. N/A MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files ending in .so must go in a -devel package. N/A MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. N/A MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. N/A MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. OK MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. OK SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226508
--- Comment #10 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.lehtola@iki.fi 2009-07-10 08:57:24 EDT --- ping?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226508
--- Comment #11 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.lehtola@iki.fi 2009-08-05 07:21:34 EDT --- ping again? Tomas?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226508
Jussi Lehtola jussi.lehtola@iki.fi changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226508
Jussi Lehtola jussi.lehtola@iki.fi changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo? |
--- Comment #12 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.lehtola@iki.fi 2010-01-01 17:51:58 EDT --- ping 3rd time
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226508
--- Comment #13 from Tomas Smetana tsmetana@redhat.com 2010-01-05 11:49:01 EDT --- Hello, I have committed a new spec to the devel branch that should include the proposed changes. It also drops the font related patch since the OSD looks terribly ugly with that...
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226508
Jussi Lehtola jussi.lehtola@iki.fi changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #14 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.lehtola@iki.fi 2010-01-06 05:54:49 EDT --- The hicolor-icon-theme issue is still there: you need it full time for dir ownership, not just in %post and %postun.
Otherwise looks fine,
APPROVED
Please fix the hicolor-icon-theme issue before shipping updates.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226508
--- Comment #15 from Tomas Smetana tsmetana@redhat.com 2010-01-06 06:41:02 EDT --- Thanks a lot for your help.
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org