[Bug 638425] New: Review Request: nawk - "The one true awk" descended from UNIX V7

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Review Request: nawk - "The one true awk" descended from UNIX V7

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638425

Summary: Review Request: nawk - "The one true awk" descended
                    from UNIX V7
           Product: Fedora
           Version: rawhide
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: medium
          Priority: low
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: [e-mail]
        ReportedBy: [e-mail]
         QAContact: [e-mail]
                CC: [e-mail], [e-mail]
   Estimated Hours: 0.0
    Classification: Fedora

Spec URL: http://mmckinst.nexcess.net/nawk/nawk.spec
SRPM URL: http://mmckinst.nexcess.net/nawk/nawk-20100523-1.fc13.src.rpm
Description: 
This is the version of awk described in "The AWK Programming Language", by Al 
Aho, Brian Kernighan, and Peter Weinberger. (Addison-Wesley, 1988, ISBN 
0-201-07981-X).

[mmckinst@fedora13 SRPMS]$ rpmlint nawk-20100523-1.fc13.src.rpm 
nawk.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) awk -> AK, awl, aw
nawk.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US awk -> AK, awl, aw
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
[mmckinst@fedora13 SRPMS]$

[Bug 638425] Review Request: nawk - "The one true awk" descended from UNIX V7

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638425

Mark McKinstry  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Blocks|                            |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR)

--- Comment #1 from Mark McKinstry  2010-09-28 20:20:06 EDT ---
This isn't the first package I've submitted but I am seeking a sponsor.

Other packages I've submitted:
bug #586473 mg - Tiny Emacs-like editor
bug #590305 vile - VI Like Emacs
bug #635875 mawk - An interpreter for the AWK programming language

Reviews I've been helping out with:
bug #630822 python-ansi2html
bug #633104 monkeysphere
bug #624294 gforth-ffl
bug #633333 iosum

[Bug 638425] Review Request: nawk - "The one true awk" descended from UNIX V7

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638425

Martin Gieseking  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
                 CC|                            |[e-mail]
         AssignedTo|[e-mail]    |[e-mail]
               Flag|                            |fedora-review?

[Bug 638425] Review Request: nawk - "The one true awk" descended from UNIX V7

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638425

Martin Gieseking  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR)      |

[Bug 638425] Review Request: nawk - "The one true awk" descended from UNIX V7

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638425

--- Comment #2 from Hiemanshu Sharma  2010-10-05 04:11:08 EDT ---
Can you please do a scratch build of the package and provide the link here.

[Bug 638425] Review Request: nawk - "The one true awk" descended from UNIX V7

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638425

--- Comment #3 from Martin Gieseking  2010-10-05 13:29:02 EDT ---
Hi Mark,

your package looks almost fine. Here are a couple of things to consider:

- add a short comment to the spec file describing the purpose of the patch

- similar to the Source fields, the numbering of patches should start with 0

- don't compress the manpage in the SPEC, since this is done automatically by
  rpmbuild

[Bug 638425] Review Request: nawk - "The one true awk" descended from UNIX V7

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638425

--- Comment #4 from Martin Gieseking  2010-10-05 13:36:48 EDT ---
Also, patch the makefile to remove compiler flag -O4. The %{optflags} already
set optimization to -O2.

[Bug 638425] Review Request: nawk - "The one true awk" descended from UNIX V7

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638425

--- Comment #5 from Bill Nottingham  2010-10-05 13:52:11 EDT ---
If I may ask, what's the motivation for adding two alternate versions of awk to
Fedora?

[Bug 638425] Review Request: nawk - "The one true awk" descended from UNIX V7

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638425

--- Comment #6 from Mark McKinstry  2010-10-05 19:59:36 EDT ---
> add a short comment to the spec file describing the purpose of the patch

Done.
> the numbering of patches should start with 0

Done.
> don't compress the manpage in the SPEC

Done.
> patch the makefile to remove compiler flag -O4

Done. I used sed to delete the line.

SPEC: http://mmckinst.nexcess.net/nawk/nawk.spec
SRPM: http://mmckinst.nexcess.net/nawk/nawk-20100523-2.fc13.src.rpm
Scratch: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2516158

[Bug 638425] Review Request: nawk - "The one true awk" descended from UNIX V7

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638425

--- Comment #7 from Mark McKinstry  2010-10-05 20:04:39 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> If I may ask, what's the motivation for adding two alternate versions of awk to
> Fedora?

The reason for mawk is it can be faster than gawk for some things [1] [2]. As
for nawk, I like doing things with awk and comparing the different awks so I
figured I'd include nawk too. nawk is also the version of awk included with the
BSDs and OS X.

[1]
http://anyall.org/blog/2009/09/dont-mawk-awk-the-fastest-and-most-elegant-bi...
[2] http://awka.sourceforge.net/compare.html

[Bug 638425] Review Request: nawk - "The one true awk" descended from UNIX V7

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638425

Stephen John Smoogen  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |[e-mail]

--- Comment #8 from Stephen John Smoogen  2010-10-05 20:19:50 EDT ---
mawk, nawk, gawk used to have slightly different syntaxes on certain problems.
For cross platform development of scripts sometimes one is available and not
the others so you end up with large exception lists (from memory on
Solaris/HP-UX use nawk, on Linux use gawk.. keep scripts separate). Having one
that is available means quicker porting/management for commercial software.

[Bug 638425] Review Request: nawk - "The one true awk" descended from UNIX V7

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638425

--- Comment #9 from Martin Gieseking  2010-10-06 14:43:17 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> Done. I used sed to delete the line.

OK, but now the preceding CC line takes effect and adds profiler flags to the
call of gcc. :)

Better use something like sed -i 's/ -O4//' makefile
Or even better, patch the makefile, as sed doesn't make rpmbuild fail if the
substitution doesn't lead to the intended change. Thus, the unwanted options
could unnoticeably appear again in a future upstream release with modified
makefile (e.g. if -O4 is replaced with -O3 for whatever reason).

[Bug 638425] Review Request: nawk - "The one true awk" descended from UNIX V7

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638425

--- Comment #10 from Mark McKinstry  2010-10-06 21:19:32 EDT ---
Martin,

Would defining CC in the make work, like I did with YACC?

old: make %{?_smp_mflags} CFLAGS="%{optflags}" YACC='bison -y'
new: make %{?_smp_mflags} CFLAGS="%{optflags}" YACC='bison -y' CC='gcc'

[Bug 638425] Review Request: nawk - "The one true awk" descended from UNIX V7

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638425

Ralf Corsepius  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |[e-mail]

--- Comment #11 from Ralf Corsepius  2010-10-06 23:21:52 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> Would defining CC in the make work, like I did with YACC?
>
> old: make %{?_smp_mflags} CFLAGS="%{optflags}" YACC='bison -y'
> new: make %{?_smp_mflags} CFLAGS="%{optflags}" YACC='bison -y' CC='gcc'

Yes, this would be better, except that you would want to use

make %{?_smp_mflags} CFLAGS="%{optflags}" YACC='bison -y' CC="%{__cc}"

[Bug 638425] Review Request: nawk - "The one true awk" descended from UNIX V7

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638425

--- Comment #12 from Martin Gieseking  2010-10-07 02:27:48 EDT ---
Yes, of course. Sorry, I didn't think about this easiest variant.

[Bug 638425] Review Request: nawk - "The one true awk" descended from UNIX V7

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638425

--- Comment #13 from Mark McKinstry  2010-10-07 18:11:45 EDT ---
Updated spec, srpm, and scratch build:

SPEC: http://mmckinst.nexcess.net/nawk/nawk.spec
SRPM: http://mmckinst.nexcess.net/nawk/nawk-20100523-3.fc13.src.rpm
Scratch: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2521563

[Bug 638425] Review Request: nawk - "The one true awk" descended from UNIX V7

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638425

Martin Gieseking  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+

--- Comment #14 from Martin Gieseking  2010-10-08 09:31:44 EDT ---
I couldn't find any further issues, thus the package is ready now.

$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-13-x86_64/result/*.rpm
nawk.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) awk -> awl, aw, wk
nawk.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US awk -> awl, aw, wk
nawk.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) awk -> awl, aw, wk
nawk.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US awk -> awl, aw, wk
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings.

The spelling errors are false positive and can be ignored.

---------------------------------
key:

[+] OK
[.] OK, not applicable
[X] needs work
---------------------------------

[+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}.
[+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license.
    - MIT (Standard ML of New Jersey Variant)

[+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
license.
[+] MUST: The file containing the text of the license(s) for the package must
be included in %doc.
    - file README containing the license text is packaged

[+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English.
[+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
[+] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source.
    $ md5sum awk.tar.gz*
    aca604d1b4c5429f089ecea59422f4dd  awk.tar.gz
    aca604d1b4c5429f089ecea59422f4dd  awk.tar.gz.1

[+] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on
at least one primary architecture.
[.] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work ...
[+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires.
[.] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly.
[.] MUST: Packages storing shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and
%postun.
[+] MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries.
[.] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, ...
[+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. 
[+] MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in %files.
[+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly.
[+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros.
[+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content.
[.] MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage.
[+] MUST: Files in %doc must not affect the runtime of the application.
[.] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package.
[.] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package.
[.] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix ...
[.] MUST: devel packages must require the base package 
[+] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives.
[.] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop
file
[+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other
packages.
[+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8.

[.] SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a
separate file ...
[+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[+] SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all
supported architectures.
[+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described.
[.] SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane.
[.] SHOULD: subpackages other than devel should require the base package.
[.] SHOULD: pkgconfig(.pc) should be placed in a -devel pkg.
[.] SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin,
...
[+] SHOULD: your package should contain man pages for binaries/scripts.

----------------
Package APPROVED
----------------

[Bug 638425] Review Request: nawk - "The one true awk" descended from UNIX V7

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638425

--- Comment #15 from Mark McKinstry  2010-10-08 11:15:23 EDT ---
Thanks!

New Package SCM Request
=======================
Package Name: nawk
Short Description: "The one true awk" descended from UNIX V7
Owners: mmckinst
Branches: f12 f13 f14 el4 el5 el6

[Bug 638425] Review Request: nawk - "The one true awk" descended from UNIX V7

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638425

Mark McKinstry  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|                            |fedora-cvs?

[Bug 638425] Review Request: nawk - "The one true awk" descended from UNIX V7

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638425

--- Comment #16 from Kevin Fenzi  2010-10-08 16:33:30 EDT ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

[Bug 638425] Review Request: nawk - "The one true awk" descended from UNIX V7

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638425

Fedora Update System  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |MODIFIED

[Bug 638425] Review Request: nawk - "The one true awk" descended from UNIX V7

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638425

--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System  2010-10-10 22:31:56 EDT ---
nawk-20100523-3.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nawk-20100523-3.fc13

[Bug 638425] Review Request: nawk - "The one true awk" descended from UNIX V7

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638425

--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System  2010-10-10 22:32:04 EDT ---
nawk-20100523-3.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nawk-20100523-3.el5

[Bug 638425] Review Request: nawk - "The one true awk" descended from UNIX V7

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638425

--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System  2010-10-10 22:32:11 EDT ---
nawk-20100523-3.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nawk-20100523-3.fc14

[Bug 638425] Review Request: nawk - "The one true awk" descended from UNIX V7

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638425

--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System  2010-10-10 22:32:17 EDT ---
nawk-20100523-3.el4 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 4.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nawk-20100523-3.el4

[Bug 638425] Review Request: nawk - "The one true awk" descended from UNIX V7

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638425

--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System  2010-10-10 22:32:24 EDT ---
nawk-20100523-3.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nawk-20100523-3.fc12

[Bug 638425] Review Request: nawk - "The one true awk" descended from UNIX V7

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638425

Fedora Update System  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|MODIFIED                    |ON_QA

--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System  2010-10-10 23:45:14 EDT ---
nawk-20100523-3.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 testing repository.  If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
 If you want to test the update, you can install it with 
 su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update nawk'.  You can provide
feedback for this update here:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nawk-20100523-3.fc14

[Bug 638425] Review Request: nawk - "The one true awk" descended from UNIX V7

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638425

--- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System  2010-10-27 18:41:18 EDT ---
nawk-20100523-3.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository.  If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

[Bug 638425] Review Request: nawk - "The one true awk" descended from UNIX V7

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638425

Fedora Update System  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ON_QA                       |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version|                            |nawk-20100523-3.fc13
         Resolution|                            |ERRATA
        Last Closed|                            |2010-10-27 18:41:23

[Bug 638425] Review Request: nawk - "The one true awk" descended from UNIX V7

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638425

--- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System  2010-10-27 18:56:13 EDT ---
nawk-20100523-3.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository.  If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

[Bug 638425] Review Request: nawk - "The one true awk" descended from UNIX V7

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638425

Fedora Update System  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Fixed In Version|nawk-20100523-3.fc13        |nawk-20100523-3.fc12

[Bug 638425] Review Request: nawk - "The one true awk" descended from UNIX V7

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638425

--- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System  2010-10-28 01:52:40 EDT ---
nawk-20100523-3.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository.  If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

[Bug 638425] Review Request: nawk - "The one true awk" descended from UNIX V7

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638425

Fedora Update System  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Fixed In Version|nawk-20100523-3.fc12        |nawk-20100523-3.fc14

[Bug 638425] Review Request: nawk - "The one true awk" descended from UNIX V7

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638425

--- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System  2010-10-28 12:51:27 EDT ---
nawk-20100523-3.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository.  If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

[Bug 638425] Review Request: nawk - "The one true awk" descended from UNIX V7

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638425

Fedora Update System  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Fixed In Version|nawk-20100523-3.fc14        |nawk-20100523-3.el5

[Bug 638425] Review Request: nawk - "The one true awk" descended from UNIX V7

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638425

--- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System  2010-10-28 12:51:40 EDT ---
nawk-20100523-3.el4 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 4 stable repository.  If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

[Bug 638425] Review Request: nawk - "The one true awk" descended from UNIX V7

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638425

Fedora Update System  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Fixed In Version|nawk-20100523-3.el5         |nawk-20100523-3.el4

[Bug 638425] Review Request: nawk - "The one true awk" descended from UNIX V7

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638425

--- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System  2011-02-25 09:39:02 EST ---
nawk-20100523-3.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nawk-20100523-3.el6

[Bug 638425] Review Request: nawk - "The one true awk" descended from UNIX V7

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638425

--- Comment #29 from Fedora Update System  2011-03-18 15:26:24 EDT ---
nawk-20100523-3.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository.

[Bug 638425] Review Request: nawk - "The one true awk" descended from UNIX V7

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638425

Fedora Update System  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Fixed In Version|nawk-20100523-3.el4         |nawk-20100523-3.el6