Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: pypolicyd-spf - SPF Policy Server for Postfix
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=606003
Summary: Review Request: pypolicyd-spf - SPF Policy Server for Postfix Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: zart@zartsoft.ru QAContact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: notting@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora
Spec URL: http://aura.zartsoft.ru/~zart/fedora/pypolicyd-spf.spec SRPM URL: http://aura.zartsoft.ru/~zart/fedora/pypolicyd-spf-0.8.0-1.fc13.src.rpm Description: pypolicyd-spf is a Postfix policy engine for Sender Policy Framework (SPF) checking. It is implemented in pure Python and uses the python-spf (pyspf) module. This SPF policy server implementation provides flexible options for different receiver policies and sender whitelisting to enable it to support a very wide range of requirements.
This is my first package and I need a sponsor.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=606003
Konstantin Zemlyak zart@zartsoft.ru changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=606003
--- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts tibbs@math.uh.edu 2010-11-23 15:00:06 EST --- Note that you can remove the %{?fedora} > 12 conditional; F13 is the oldest thing you can build for. There were also updated Python guidelines which you should read over. The python3 stuff probably has no bearing on this package, but you will at least need BuildRequires: python2-devel instead of python-devel.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=606003
Jason Tibbitts tibbs@math.uh.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |StalledSubmitter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=606003
--- Comment #2 from Konstantin Zemlyak zart@zartsoft.ru 2010-12-02 00:58:10 EST --- Thanks for reviewing.
I've updated package to version 0.8.1 released few days ago. Spec has been updated to use python2-devel and %{}-style for consistency. I'll keep %{?fedora} > 12 for now since I'm still running f12 myself.
http://aura.zartsoft.ru/~zart/fedora/ has both src and noarch rpms from koji's scratch builds:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2638340 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2638385 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2638409
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=606003
Matthias Runge mrunge@matthias-runge.de changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mrunge@matthias-runge.de
--- Comment #3 from Matthias Runge mrunge@matthias-runge.de 2012-02-27 09:31:49 EST --- any progress here?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=606003
Matthias Runge mrunge@matthias-runge.de changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |INSUFFICIENT_DATA Last Closed| |2012-03-24 14:19:39
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org