[Bug 2183334] New: Review Request: rust-toml_datetime - TOML-compatible datetime type

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2183334

Bug ID: 2183334
           Summary: Review Request: rust-toml_datetime - TOML-compatible
                    datetime type
           Product: Fedora
           Version: rawhide
          Hardware: All
                OS: Linux
            Status: NEW
         Component: Package Review
          Severity: medium
          Priority: medium
          Assignee: [e-mail]
          Reporter: [e-mail]
        QA Contact: [e-mail]
                CC: [e-mail]
  Target Milestone: ---
    Classification: Fedora

Spec URL: https://decathorpe.fedorapeople.org/rust-toml_datetime.spec
SRPM URL:
https://decathorpe.fedorapeople.org/rust-toml_datetime-0.6.1-1.fc38.src.rpm

Description:
A TOML-compatible datetime type.

Fedora Account System Username: decathorpe

koji scratch build for rawhide:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=99336531

[Bug 2183334] Review Request: rust-toml_datetime - TOML-compatible datetime type

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2183334

Jakub Kadlčík  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                URL|                            |https://crates.io/crates/to
                   |                            |ml_datetime

--- Comment #1 from Jakub Kadlčík  ---
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/5731290
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-rev...

Please take a look if any issues were found.

---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

[Bug 2183334] Review Request: rust-toml_datetime - TOML-compatible datetime type

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2183334

Felix Wang  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Doc Type|---                         |If docs needed, set a value
                 CC|                            |[e-mail]

--- Comment #2 from Felix Wang  ---
The spec file was generated with rust2rpm, and Copr build successfully. It
seems good to me, so I approved the package.

[Bug 2183334] Review Request: rust-toml_datetime - TOML-compatible datetime type

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2183334

Felix Wang  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Flags|                            |fedora-review+

[Bug 2183334] Review Request: rust-toml_datetime - TOML-compatible datetime type

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2183334

--- Comment #3 from Fabio Valentini  ---
Thanks! You will need to change the "Assignee" field of the bug to yourself (by
clicking "Take"), as well, for the review to be valid.

I see you're interested in getting the "toml" crate updated (going by the PR
you submitted)? I have the update to the latest version prepared, but this
package and two more needed to be reviewed (serde_spanned and winnow).

[Bug 2183334] Review Request: rust-toml_datetime - TOML-compatible datetime type

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2183334

Felix Wang  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Assignee|[e-mail]    |[e-mail]

[Bug 2183334] Review Request: rust-toml_datetime - TOML-compatible datetime type

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2183334

--- Comment #4 from Felix Wang  ---
Sorry, I missed with the change of Assignee field. Yes, I'm interested in
rust-packaging, I just became a packager not long ago and take some rpm
packages which is not about rust. When I try to build an interested application
written by rust, it may need to build several nonexistent rust dependencies
that need review requests and some existing rust packages that need to be
updated, which the rust-packaging process is much more alleviated by rust2rpm
tool though, I still give up.

[Bug 2183334] Review Request: rust-toml_datetime - TOML-compatible datetime type

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2183334

--- Comment #5 from Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions  ---
The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-toml_datetime

[Bug 2183334] Review Request: rust-toml_datetime - TOML-compatible datetime type

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2183334

Fabio Valentini  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |POST

--- Comment #6 from Fabio Valentini  ---
> When I try to build an interested application written by rust [...], I still give up.

What project were you interested in packaging? Maybe there's something other
packagers can do to help make it happen, you don't need to do everything alone.

[Bug 2183334] Review Request: rust-toml_datetime - TOML-compatible datetime type

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2183334

Fedora Update System  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|POST                        |MODIFIED

--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2023-819f0f3a80 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 39.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-819f0f3a80

[Bug 2183334] Review Request: rust-toml_datetime - TOML-compatible datetime type

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2183334

Fedora Update System  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Resolution|---                         |ERRATA
             Status|MODIFIED                    |CLOSED
        Last Closed|                            |2023-04-03 22:01:41

--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2023-819f0f3a80 has been pushed to the Fedora 39 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.