Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226165
Summary: Merge Review: mt-st Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: nobody@fedoraproject.org QAContact: fedora-package-review@redhat.com CC: jnovy@redhat.com
Fedora Merge Review: mt-st
http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/mt-st/ Initial Owner: jnovy@redhat.com
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Merge Review: mt-st
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226165
bugzilla@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora
------- Additional Comments From rbrich@redhat.com 2007-09-05 07:02 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: mt-st Updated Fedora Owners: rbrich@redhat.com
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Merge Review: mt-st
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226165
rbrich@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Merge Review: mt-st
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226165
------- Additional Comments From jnovy@redhat.com 2007-09-05 07:14 EST ------- Agreed with ownership transition.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Merge Review: mt-st
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226165
rbrich@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |
------- Additional Comments From rbrich@redhat.com 2007-09-05 09:10 EST ------- canceling request, it's now ok (via pkgdb)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226165
Miroslav Lichvar mlichvar@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mlichvar@redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody@fedoraproject.org |mlichvar@redhat.com
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226165
Miroslav Lichvar mlichvar@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dhorak@redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review?
--- Comment #4 from Miroslav Lichvar mlichvar@redhat.com 2009-12-01 11:55:26 EDT --- Review follows:
OK source files match upstream: fdd5f5ec673c9f630a102ceff7612774 mt-st-1.1.tar.gz
OK package meets naming and versioning guidelines. OK specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. OK dist tag is present. OK build root is correct. OK license field matches the actual license. OK license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. OK latest version is being packaged. OK BuildRequires are proper. OK compiler flags are appropriate. OK %clean is present. OK package builds in mock. OK debuginfo package looks complete. NO rpmlint is silent. mt-st.x86_64: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/stinit mt-st.x86_64: E: no-status-entry /etc/rc.d/init.d/stinit mt-st.x86_64: W: no-reload-entry /etc/rc.d/init.d/stinit mt-st.x86_64: E: subsys-not-used /etc/rc.d/init.d/stinit mt-st.x86_64: W: incoherent-init-script-name stinit ('mt-st', 'mt-std')
Enabled by default and incoherent name are ok, but the script should be probably updated to match the Fedora init script guidelines.
OK final provides and requires look sane. N/A %check is present and all tests pass. OK no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. OK owns the directories it creates. OK doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. OK no duplicates in %files. OK file permissions are appropriate. OK scriptlets are sane. OK code, not content. OK documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. OK %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. OK no headers. OK no pkgconfig files. OK no libtool .la droppings. OK not a GUI app.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226165
Dan Horák dan@danny.cz changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dan@danny.cz
--- Comment #5 from Dan Horák dan@danny.cz 2009-12-02 05:46:09 EDT --- The stinit initscript was recently updated in F-12 and rawhide (see bug 541592 for details) and it doesn't start any daemon, but it does only a one-time initialization of tape devices, so I think it can live as it is.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226165
Miroslav Lichvar mlichvar@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #6 from Miroslav Lichvar mlichvar@redhat.com 2009-12-02 06:05:55 EDT --- Ok, thanks. The package is APPROVED.
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org