https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2324717
Bug ID: 2324717 Summary: New package: Mozilla VPN Product: Fedora Version: 41 Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nobody@fedoraproject.org Reporter: heri@mailbox.org QA Contact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Link ID: Github mozilla-mobile/mozilla-vpn-client/issues/1556 Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
It would be great of the Mozilla VPN client would be packaged for and included in Fedora.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2324717
Dennis Schridde heri@mailbox.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment|0 |updated
--- Comment #0 has been edited ---
Description of problem:
It would be great of the Mozilla VPN client would be packaged for and included in Fedora, cf. https://github.com/mozilla-mobile/mozilla-vpn-client/issues/450.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2324717
Dennis Schridde heri@mailbox.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment|0 |updated
--- Comment #0 has been edited ---
Description of problem:
It would be great of the Mozilla VPN client would be packaged for and included in Fedora, cf. https://github.com/mozilla-mobile/mozilla-vpn-client/issues/1556.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2324717
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Review Service fedora-review-bot@fedoraproject.org --- The ticket summary is not in the correct format. Expected:
Review Request: <main package name here> - <short summary here>
Found:
New package: Mozilla VPN
As a consequence, the package name cannot be parsed and submitted to be automatically build. Please modify the ticket summary and trigger a build by typing [fedora-review-service-build].
--- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service
If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2324717
Dennis Schridde heri@mailbox.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|New package: Mozilla VPN |Review Request: mozillavpn | |- A fast, secure and easy | |to use VPN. Built by the | |makers of Firefox.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2324717
--- Comment #2 from Dennis Schridde heri@mailbox.org --- [fedora-review-service-build]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2324717
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Review Service fedora-review-bot@fedoraproject.org --- Cannot find any valid SRPM URL for this ticket. Common causes are:
- You didn't specify `SRPM URL: ...` in the ticket description or any of your comments - The URL schema isn't HTTP or HTTPS - The SRPM package linked in your URL doesn't match the package name specified in the ticket summary
--- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service
If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2324717
Fabio Valentini decathorpe@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |NOTABUG CC| |decathorpe@gmail.com Last Closed| |2024-11-09 21:04:03
--- Comment #4 from Fabio Valentini decathorpe@gmail.com --- This is not a package wishlist - it's a way to submit packages that are intended to be included in official Fedora repositories for review.
You'll likely have more luck getting somebody to look at packaging Mozilla VPN by asking in the Fedora Golang channel on the Fedora Matrix server, or by posting to the Golang mailing list.
Note that I personally tried packaging Mozilla VPN at some point in the past, and got a package into a state where it built and installed correctly, but the built executable crashed immediately. I couldn't figure out why, and gave up.
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org