Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: rubygem-tidy_ffi - Tidy library interface via FFI
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=796112
Summary: Review Request: rubygem-tidy_ffi - Tidy library interface via FFI Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: guillermo.gomez@gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: notting@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: ---
Spec URL:http://gomix.fedorapeople.org/rubygem-tidy_ffi/rubygem-tidy_ffi.spec SRPM URL:http://gomix.fedorapeople.org/rubygem-tidy_ffi/rubygem-tidy_ffi-0.1.4-1.fc16... Description: Tidy library interface via FFI
$ rpmlint -v SPECS/rubygem-tidy_ffi.spec SPECS/rubygem-tidy_ffi.spec: I: checking-url http://rubygems.org/gems/tidy_ffi-0.1.4.gem (timeout 10 seconds) 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint -v /var/lib/mock/fedora-16-x86_64/result/rubygem-tidy_ffi-0.1.4-1.fc16.noarch.rpm rubygem-tidy_ffi.noarch: I: checking rubygem-tidy_ffi.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency libtidy [1] false positive rubygem-tidy_ffi.noarch: I: checking-url http://github.com/libc/tidy_ffi (timeout 10 seconds)
$ rpmlint -v /var/lib/mock/fedora-16-x86_64/result/rubygem-tidy_ffi-doc-0.1.4-1.fc16.noarch.rpm rubygem-tidy_ffi-doc.noarch: I: checking rubygem-tidy_ffi-doc.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) ffi -> ff, ff i rubygem-tidy_ffi-doc.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US ffi -> ff, ff i rubygem-tidy_ffi-doc.noarch: I: checking-url http://github.com/libc/tidy_ffi (timeout 10 seconds) rubygem-tidy_ffi-doc.noarch: W: unexpanded-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/tidy_ffi-0.1.4/ri/TidyFFI/Tidy/options%3d-i.yaml %3d rubygem-tidy_ffi-doc.noarch: W: unexpanded-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/tidy_ffi-0.1.4/ri/TidyFFI/Interface/string%3d-i.yaml %3d rubygem-tidy_ffi-doc.noarch: W: unexpanded-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/tidy_ffi-0.1.4/ri/TidyFFI/Interface/option_valid%3f-c.yaml %3f rubygem-tidy_ffi-doc.noarch: W: unexpanded-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/tidy_ffi-0.1.4/ri/TidyFFI/Tidy/validate_options%3f-c.yaml %3f rubygem-tidy_ffi-doc.noarch: W: unexpanded-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/tidy_ffi-0.1.4/ri/TidyFFI/Tidy/default_options%3d-c.yaml %3d 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 7 warnings.
rubygem-tidy_ffi.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency libtidy [1] false positive
This rpmlint error is a false positive since the libs its a explicit dependency, its a ruby noarch pkg to open the lib via ffi.
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=796112
Jason Tibbitts tibbs@math.uh.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |needinfo?(guillermo.gomez@g | |mail.com)
--- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts tibbs@math.uh.edu --- I am triaging old review tickets. I can't promise a review if you reply, but by closing out the stale tickets we can devote extra attention to the ones which aren't stale.
Build fails for me; here is a scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5321601
In addition, this almost certainly needs some updating for current ruby guidelines.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=796112
James Hogarth james.hogarth@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED CC| |james.hogarth@gmail.com Blocks| |201449 (FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution|--- |NOTABUG Flags|needinfo?(guillermo.gomez@g | |mail.com) | Last Closed| |2015-12-03 22:55:08
--- Comment #2 from James Hogarth james.hogarth@gmail.com --- As this does not build and the requester had not responded to a needs info in over a year closing the bug as a dead review.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=201449 [Bug 201449] FE-DEADREVIEW -- Reviews stalled due to lack of submitter response should be blocking this bug.
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org