Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225668
Summary: Merge Review: cscope Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: nobody@fedoraproject.org QAContact: fedora-package-review@redhat.com CC: nhorman@redhat.com
Fedora Merge Review: cscope
http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/cscope/ Initial Owner: nhorman@redhat.com
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Merge Review: cscope
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225668
nhorman@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody@fedoraproject.org |nhorman@redhat.com
------- Additional Comments From nhorman@redhat.com 2007-01-31 13:33 EST ------- Don't Think anything needs to be done here. I assume that merge review implies merge to fedora core, but cscope has been in core for some time now. Please reopen if this is not the case
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Merge Review: cscope
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225668
nhorman@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE Fixed In Version| |15.5
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Merge Review: cscope
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225668
kevin@tummy.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |NEW Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|CURRENTRELEASE |
------- Additional Comments From kevin@tummy.com 2007-01-31 15:45 EST ------- This is part of the merge of core and extras into the grand unified Fedora. All core packages are going to need reviewed as part of this process.
Reopening to allow this package to get reviewed.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Merge Review: cscope
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225668
nhorman@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE Fixed In Version|15.5 |15.5-15.2.fc7
------- Additional Comments From nhorman@redhat.com 2007-02-01 15:28 EST -------
- MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. Check, rpmlint passes cscope-15.5-15.2.%{dist} with no output
- MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. Check
- MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec Check
- MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. Check
- MUST: The package must be licensed with an open-source compatible license and meet other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. Check. BSD license
- MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. Check
- MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. Check
- MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. Check
- MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. If the reviewer is unable to read the spec file, it will be impossible to perform a review. Fedora is not the place for entries into the Obfuscated Code Contest ([WWW] http://www.ioccc.org/). Check
- MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. Check
- MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Check
- MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch needs to have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number should then be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. New packages will not have bugzilla entries during the review process, so they should put this description in the comment until the package is approved, then file the bugzilla entry, and replace the long explanation with the bug number. (Extras Only) The bug should be marked as blocking one (or more) of the following bugs to simplify tracking such issues: [WWW] FE-ExcludeArch-x86, [WWW] FE-ExcludeArch-x64, [WWW] FE-ExcludeArch-ppc N.A. Package builds on all supported arches
- MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. Check.
- MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. N/A. cscope does not support locales.
- MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. If the package has multiple subpackages with libraries, each subpackage should also have a %post/%postun section that calls /sbin/ldconfig. N/A. No shared libraries included.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Merge Review: cscope
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225668
dennis@ausil.us changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |NEW Resolution|CURRENTRELEASE |
------- Additional Comments From dennis@ausil.us 2007-02-01 15:45 EST ------- You can not review your own package someone else must do it. Just based on your review here i see one problem the disttag nees to be %{?dist} not %{dist}
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Merge Review: cscope
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225668
------- Additional Comments From paul@city-fan.org 2007-02-04 04:00 EST ------- There should also not be a dot before the %{?dist}, since %{?dist} includes one already. The result of the extra dot is that this package just hit Rawhide:
cscope-15.5-15.2..fc7.i386.rpm
Note the double dot in the release name.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Merge Review: cscope
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225668
------- Additional Comments From nhorman@redhat.com 2007-02-05 15:31 EST ------- Comments #4 and #5 fixed in cscope-15.5-15.3%{?dist}. Thanks!
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Merge Review: cscope
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225668
bugzilla@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium
nhorman@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nhorman@redhat.com |nobody@fedoraproject.org
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Merge Review: cscope
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225668
bugzilla@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora
ajackson@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+
------- Additional Comments From ajackson@redhat.com 2007-06-29 16:32 EST ------- Package looks good to me, APPROVED.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225668
manuel wolfshant wolfy@nobugconsulting.ro changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody@fedoraproject.org |ajax@redhat.com
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225668
Adam Jackson ajax@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE
--- Comment #8 from Adam Jackson ajax@redhat.com 2009-05-08 18:00:24 EDT --- Package is fine in rawhide, closing.
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org