[Bug 698405] New: Review Request: mcollective - A framework to build server orchestration or parallel job execution systems

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Review Request: mcollective - A framework to build server orchestration or parallel job execution systems

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=698405

Summary: Review Request: mcollective - A framework to build
                    server orchestration or parallel job execution systems
           Product: Fedora
           Version: rawhide
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: medium
          Priority: medium
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: [e-mail]
        ReportedBy: [e-mail]
         QAContact: [e-mail]
                CC: [e-mail], [e-mail]
   Estimated Hours: 0.0
    Classification: Fedora
      Story Points: ---

Spec URL: http://jcollie.fedorapeople.org/mcollective.spec
SRPM URL: http://jcollie.fedorapeople.org/mcollective-1.1.3-3.fc15.src.rpm
Description:
The Marionette Collective is a framework to build server orchestration
or parallel job execution systems.

[Bug 698405] Review Request: mcollective - A framework to build server orchestration or parallel job execution systems

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=698405

Steve Traylen  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
                 CC|                            |[e-mail]
          QAContact|[e-mail] |[e-mail]
               Flag|                            |fedora-review?

[Bug 698405] Review Request: mcollective - A framework to build server orchestration or parallel job execution systems

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=698405

--- Comment #1 from Steve Traylen  2011-08-18 15:18:28 EDT ---
rpmlint errors as below, with the exception of "no-manual-page-for-binary" I
expect the rest can 
possibly be fixed.

I'll look some more now.

SPECS/mcollective.spec:7: W: non-standard-group System Tools
SPECS/mcollective.spec:36: W: non-standard-group System Tools
SPECS/mcollective.spec:50: W: non-standard-group System Tools
SPECS/mcollective.spec:121: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 73,
tab: line 121)

mcollective.noarch: W: non-standard-group System Tools
mcollective.noarch: W: invalid-license Apache License, Version 2
mcollective.noarch: E: non-readable /etc/mcollective/server.cfg 0440L
mcollective.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mcollectived
mcollective-client.noarch: W: non-standard-group System Tools
mcollective-client.noarch: W: invalid-license Apache License, Version 2
mcollective-client.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag
/etc/mcollective/rpc-help.erb
mcollective-client.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mc-controller
mcollective-client.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mc-rpc
mcollective-client.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mc-find-hosts
mcollective-client.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mc-inventory
mcollective-client.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mc-facts
mcollective-client.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mc-call-agent
mcollective-client.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mc-ping
mcollective-common.noarch: W: non-standard-group System Tools
mcollective-common.noarch: W: invalid-license Apache License, Version 2
mcollective.src: W: non-standard-group System Tools
mcollective.src: W: invalid-license Apache License, Version 2
mcollective.src:121: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 73, tab:
line

[Bug 698405] Review Request: mcollective - A framework to build server orchestration or parallel job execution systems

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=698405

--- Comment #2 from Steve Traylen  2011-08-18 15:45:00 EDT ---
1) You have a few mentions of '/etc/init.d' which should be /etc/rc.d/init.d
   and in fact should be %{_initrddir}. You have to set this if you 
   are targeting EPEL5 as well (yes please).

2) Given that mcollective and mcollective-client requires mcollective-common
   I see no need to duplicate the

Requires: ruby
    Requires: rubygems
    Requires: rubygem-stomp

on these packages.

3) Version 1.3.0 looks to be the newest version.

4) You have 
    Requires: rubygem(stomp)
   and 
    Requires: rubygem-stomp
   in some places. 
   See ruby guidelines:

5) The ruby(abi) requires should be defined.
   http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Ruby

6) Notice how ruby_sitelib is defined here.
   http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Ruby

[Bug 698405] Review Request: mcollective - A framework to build server orchestration or parallel job execution systems

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=698405

--- Comment #3 from Steve Traylen  2011-11-12 11:13:57 EST ---
ping

[Bug 698405] Review Request: mcollective - A framework to build server orchestration or parallel job execution systems

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=698405

--- Comment #4 from Jeffrey C. Ollie  2011-11-21 08:58:22 EST ---
Spec URL: http://jcollie.fedorapeople.org/mcollective.spec
SRPM URL: http://jcollie.fedorapeople.org/mcollective-1.3.1-2.fc16.src.rpm

Yes, I will be maintaining branches for EPEL in addition to Fedora.

[Bug 698405] Review Request: mcollective - A framework to build server orchestration or parallel job execution systems

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=698405

Steve Traylen  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|[e-mail]    |[e-mail]

--- Comment #5 from Steve Traylen  2011-11-30 18:38:29 EST ---

All points above look to be fixed, thanks.

The SPEC file just does a unpack and copy things in to the correct place
so the review is pretty simple.

A build and rpmlint shows

./mcollective.spec:179: E: files-attr-not-set

if you really plan to target EPEL5 this should be added back.

More significant:

mcollective.noarch: E: non-readable /etc/mcollective/server.cfg 0440L
mcollective.noarch: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/mcollective
mcollective.noarch: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/mcollective
mcollective-client.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag
/etc/mcollective/rpc-help.erb

Checking quickly all of these they can and should be fixed.

This is other wise looking fairly good, licensing all looks fine.

[Bug 698405] Review Request: mcollective - A framework to build server orchestration or parallel job execution systems

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=698405

Steve Traylen  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
          QAContact|[e-mail]       |[e-mail]

[Bug 698405] Review Request: mcollective - A framework to build server orchestration or parallel job execution systems

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=698405

--- Comment #6 from Jeffrey C. Ollie  2011-12-01 09:42:03 EST ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> ./mcollective.spec:179: E: files-attr-not-set
>
> if you really plan to target EPEL5 this should be added back.

Fixed.
> More significant:
>
> mcollective.noarch: E: non-readable /etc/mcollective/server.cfg 0440L

This is not world-readable deliberately as it may contain sensitive passwords. 
The client.cfg should be that way as well.  If the admin wants to open up
access later it's probably best to use an ACL to give access to specific users.
> mcollective.noarch: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/mcollective
> mcollective.noarch: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/mcollective
> mcollective-client.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag
> /etc/mcollective/rpc-help.erb

These should all be fixed.

Spec URL: http://jcollie.fedorapeople.org/mcollective.spec
SRPM URL: http://jcollie.fedorapeople.org/mcollective-1.3.1-3.fc16.src.rpm

[Bug 698405] Review Request: mcollective - A framework to build server orchestration or parallel job execution systems

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=698405

--- Comment #7 from Steve Traylen  2011-12-05 14:16:12 EST ---
 +:ok, =:needs attention, -:needs fixing

MUST Items:
[=] MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package.

$ rpmlint ./mcollective.spec 
./mcollective.spec:164: E: files-attr-not-set
./mcollective.spec:173: E: files-attr-not-set
./mcollective.spec:181: E: files-attr-not-set
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 0 warnings.

Can you swap the lines:
%doc COPYING
%defattr(-,root,root,-)

to get rid of this.

$ rpmlint ./*.rpm

This is still present:
mcollective.noarch: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/mcollective

See

$ rpmlint  -I service-default-enabled

[+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}
[+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet
the Licensing Guidelines.
ASL 2.0
[+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
license.
Licensing is very clear.
[+] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package must be included in %doc.
COPYING
[+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English.
[+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
[+] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source,
as provided in the spec URL.
$ md5sum mcollective-1.3.1.tgz ../SOURCES/mcollective-1.3.1.tgz 
c63901134ea66973702720861f020d3a  mcollective-1.3.1.tgz
c63901134ea66973702720861f020d3a  ../SOURCES/mcollective-1.3.1.tgz

[+] MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on
at least one supported architecture..
[+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not
create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does
create that directory.
[+] MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing.
[+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set
with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a
%defattr(...) line.
[+] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf
%{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT).
[+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros
section of Packaging Guidelines.
[] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissible content. This is
described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines.
[+] MUST: Large documentation files should go in a doc subpackage.
[+] MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base
package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} =
%{version}-%{release} 
[+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other
packages.
[+] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf
%{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT).
[+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8.

SHOULD Items:
[+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.

[to be checked.] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as
described.
[+] SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane.
[=] SHOULD: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
files.

You missed a few '-p' on the last installs:

%{__install} -m0640 etc/server.cfg.dist %{buildroot}/etc/mcollective/server.cfg
%{__install} -m0640 etc/client.cfg.dist %{buildroot}/etc/mcollective/client.cfg
%{__install} -m0644 etc/facts.yaml.dist %{buildroot}/etc/mcollective/facts.yaml
%{__install} -m0644 etc/rpc-help.erb %{buildroot}/etc/mcollective/rpc-help.erb

Looking good generally, let me have a go at installing and running it.

Steve.

[Bug 698405] Review Request: mcollective - A framework to build server orchestration or parallel job execution systems

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=698405

--- Comment #8 from Steve Traylen  2011-12-05 15:10:36 EST ---

Just installed rabbitmq and ran mcollective okay.

# mc-find-hosts 
herb.home

The deamon starts  up fine and creates the logfile

/var/log/mcollective.log

is there something that rotates and deletes this log file eventually?

I see the package contains

http://github.com/ahoward/systemu

I think this should be packaged separately?

Steve.

[Bug 698405] Review Request: mcollective - A framework to build server orchestration or parallel job execution systems

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=698405

--- Comment #9 from Jeffrey C. Ollie  2011-12-05 16:17:20 EST ---
Spec URL: http://jcollie.fedorapeople.org/mcollective.spec
SRPM URL: http://jcollie.fedorapeople.org/mcollective-1.3.1-4.fc16.src.rpm

OK, this should take care of the remaining rpmlint problems.  mcollective
manages it's logfile itself.  See the documentation for the keeplogs and
max_log_size parameters:

http://docs.puppetlabs.com/mcollective/reference/basic/configuration.html

I'll work on getting a package review of systemu up ASAP.

[Bug 698405] Review Request: mcollective - A framework to build server orchestration or parallel job execution systems

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=698405

Jeffrey C. Ollie  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Depends on|                            |760357

[Bug 698405] Review Request: mcollective - A framework to build server orchestration or parallel job execution systems

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=698405

--- Comment #10 from Jeffrey C. Ollie  2011-12-05 16:50:46 EST ---
systemu review request here:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=760357

[Bug 698405] Review Request: mcollective - A framework to build server orchestration or parallel job execution systems

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=698405

Vít Ondruch  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |[e-mail]

--- Comment #11 from Vít Ondruch  2011-12-06 08:42:52 EST ---
Could you please replace the Perl call with either sed, awk or some nice ruby
oneliner [1]? I understand that Perl is just tool to do the job and this may
sound ridiculous, but:

1) This is Ruby package
2) There are attempts to remove Perl from minimal build root, so you'll save
yourself from troubles in future.

[1] http://benoithamelin.tumblr.com/ruby1line

[Bug 698405] Review Request: mcollective - A framework to build server orchestration or parallel job execution systems

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=698405

--- Comment #12 from Jeffrey C. Ollie  2011-12-06 16:35:45 EST ---
(In reply to comment #11)
> Could you please replace the Perl call with either sed, awk or some nice ruby
> oneliner [1]? I understand that Perl is just tool to do the job and this may
> sound ridiculous, but:

Actually, I've switched to using a pure patch to do the work...

[Bug 698405] Review Request: mcollective - A framework to build server orchestration or parallel job execution systems

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=698405

--- Comment #13 from Jeffrey C. Ollie  2011-12-06 16:38:09 EST ---
Spec URL: http://jcollie.fedorapeople.org/mcollective.spec
SRPM URL: http://jcollie.fedorapeople.org/mcollective-1.3.1-5.fc16.src.rpm

Switches to use a patch to remove vendor libraries and to disable service by
default.  Removes internal systemu library and requires systemu rubygem.

[Bug 698405] Review Request: mcollective - A framework to build server orchestration or parallel job execution systems

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=698405

--- Comment #14 from Vít Ondruch  2011-12-07 07:29:16 EST ---
Nice try, thank you. Unfortunately I can see another two perl lines still
present in %build section.

[Bug 698405] Review Request: mcollective - A framework to build server orchestration or parallel job execution systems

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=698405

--- Comment #15 from Jeffrey C. Ollie  2011-12-07 12:20:22 EST ---
(In reply to comment #14)
> Nice try, thank you. Unfortunately I can see another two perl lines still
> present in %build section.

Doh! Completely forgot about those.

Spec URL: http://jcollie.fedorapeople.org/mcollective.spec
SRPM URL: http://jcollie.fedorapeople.org/mcollective-1.3.1-6.fc16.src.rpm

[Bug 698405] Review Request: mcollective - A framework to build server orchestration or parallel job execution systems

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=698405

Steve Traylen  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+

--- Comment #16 from Steve Traylen  2011-12-09 08:57:24 EST ---
All comments were addressed,

I also cringed at the %perl statements in there but could not give a reason for
them to
go. I'm glad they have :-)

APPROVED

[Bug 698405] Review Request: mcollective - A framework to build server orchestration or parallel job execution systems

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=698405

--- Comment #17 from Jeffrey C. Ollie  2011-12-09 09:57:18 EST ---
(In reply to comment #16)
> I also cringed at the %perl statements in there but could not give a reason for
> them to
> go. I'm glad they have :-)

Yeah using Perl is like trying to pound a nail with a sledgehammer but I'm
usually better at writing regexes with Perl than sed, especially if they are
complex.  These were trivial so it was easy to replace them.

[Bug 698405] Review Request: mcollective - A framework to build server orchestration or parallel job execution systems

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=698405

Jeffrey C. Ollie  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|                            |fedora-cvs?

--- Comment #18 from Jeffrey C. Ollie  2011-12-09 10:20:35 EST ---
New Package SCM Request
=======================
Package Name: mcollective
Short Description: A framework to build server orchestration or parallel job
execution systems
Owners: jcollie
Branches: f16 f15 el6 el5
InitialCC:

[Bug 698405] Review Request: mcollective - A framework to build server orchestration or parallel job execution systems

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=698405

--- Comment #19 from Jon Ciesla  2011-12-09 10:37:19 EST ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

[Bug 698405] Review Request: mcollective - A framework to build server orchestration or parallel job execution systems

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=698405

Fedora Update System  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |MODIFIED

[Bug 698405] Review Request: mcollective - A framework to build server orchestration or parallel job execution systems

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=698405

--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System  2011-12-09 15:55:34 EST ---
mcollective-1.3.1-6.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mcollective-1.3.1-6.el6

[Bug 698405] Review Request: mcollective - A framework to build server orchestration or parallel job execution systems

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=698405

--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System  2011-12-09 15:57:04 EST ---
mcollective-1.3.1-6.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mcollective-1.3.1-6.el5

[Bug 698405] Review Request: mcollective - A framework to build server orchestration or parallel job execution systems

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=698405

--- Comment #22 from Steve Traylen  2011-12-09 18:42:43 EST ---
Hi Jeffrey,

It's your call but does it make sense to release with 1.3.2 at this point
  since just released.

Steve.

[Bug 698405] Review Request: mcollective - A framework to build server orchestration or parallel job execution systems

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=698405

Fedora Update System  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|MODIFIED                    |ON_QA

--- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System  2011-12-10 16:23:36 EST ---
Package mcollective-1.3.1-6.el6:
* should fix your issue,
* was pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 testing repository,
* should be available at your local mirror within two days.
Update it with:
# su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=epel-testing mcollective-1.3.1-6.el6'
as soon as you are able to.
Please go to the following url:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2011-5182/mcollective-1....
then log in and leave karma (feedback).

[Bug 698405] Review Request: mcollective - A framework to build server orchestration or parallel job execution systems

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=698405

--- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System  2011-12-14 15:18:22 EST ---
rubygem-systemu-2.4.1-2.fc15,mcollective-1.3.1-6.fc15 has been submitted as an
update for Fedora 15.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-systemu-2.4.1-2.fc15,mcollec...

[Bug 698405] Review Request: mcollective - A framework to build server orchestration or parallel job execution systems

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=698405

--- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System  2011-12-16 11:04:43 EST ---
mcollective-1.3.1-6.fc16,rubygem-systemu-2.4.1-2.fc16 has been submitted as an
update for Fedora 16.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mcollective-1.3.1-6.fc16,rubygem-sys...

[Bug 698405] Review Request: mcollective - A framework to build server orchestration or parallel job execution systems

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=698405

--- Comment #26 from Steve Traylen  2012-04-16 10:33:52 EDT ---
Hi,
As this is not released yet can we update this to the current 1.3.3 or are you
waiting
for mcollective 1.3 to be declared stable?

https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!topic/mcollective-users/h2M07Ih...