https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1012337
Bug ID: 1012337 Summary: Review Request: cajun-jsonapi - cross-platform C++ header library for JSON Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nobody@fedoraproject.org Reporter: daniel@pocock.com.au QA Contact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: notting@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Spec URL: https://raw.github.com/cajun-jsonapi/cajun-jsonapi/master/cajun-jsonapi.spec SRPM URL: http://www.readytechnology.co.uk/srpms/cajun-jsonapi-2.0.3-1.fc19.src.rpm Description: cross-platform C++ header library for JSON Fedora Account System Username: pocock
CAJUN JSON API is a build dependency for the next version of reSIProcate
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1012337
Bill Nottingham notting@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|package-review@lists.fedora | |project.org | CC|notting@redhat.com |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1012337
Peter Lemenkov lemenkov@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |lemenkov@gmail.com Assignee|nobody@fedoraproject.org |lemenkov@gmail.com Flags| |fedora-review?
--- Comment #1 from Peter Lemenkov lemenkov@gmail.com --- I'll review it.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1012337
--- Comment #2 from Peter Lemenkov lemenkov@gmail.com --- REVIEW:
Legend: + = PASSED, - = FAILED, 0 = Not Applicable
+ rpmlint is almost silent
sulaco ~/rpmbuild/SPECS: rpmlint ../RPMS/ppc/cajun-jsonapi-devel-2.0.3-1.fc21.ppc.rpm ../SRPMS/cajun-jsonapi-2.0.3-1.fc21.src.rpm cajun-jsonapi-devel.ppc: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/cajun-jsonapi-devel/Readme.txt cajun-jsonapi-devel.ppc: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/cajun-jsonapi-devel/ReleaseNotes.txt
^^^ Please convert these files to UTF-8.
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. sulaco ~/rpmbuild/SPECS:
+ The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. + The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec.
+/- The package almost meets the Packaging Guidelines. I see few things that should be improved.
1. First of all - this package should be marked as noarch since it doesn't depend on any arch-specific entity. So please remove
%define debug_package %{nil}
and add the following line instead:
BuildArch: noarch
2. Also you may remove unneeded "%defattr(-,root,root,-)" in the %files section. It becomes obsolete since Fedora Core 6 or RHEL 5.
+ The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines. + The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. + The spec file is written in American English. + The spec file for the package is legible. + The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. + All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires. 0 No need to handle locales. 0 No shared library files. + The package does NOT bundle copies of system libraries. + The package is not designed to be relocatable. + The package owns all directories that it creates. + The package does not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. + Permissions on files are set properly. + The package consistently uses macros. + The package contains code, or permissible content. 0 No extremely large documentation files. + Anything, the package includes as %doc, does not affect the runtime of the application. 0 No header files. 0 No static libraries. 0 No pkgconfig(.pc) files. 0 The package doesn't contain library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1). + The package does NOT contain any .la libtool archives. 0 Not a GUI application. + The package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. + All filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8.
So please fix/comment the issues mentioned above and I'll finish it.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1012337
--- Comment #3 from Peter Lemenkov lemenkov@gmail.com --- (In reply to Peter Lemenkov from comment #2)
REVIEW:
Legend: + = PASSED, - = FAILED, 0 = Not Applicable
- rpmlint is almost silent
sulaco ~/rpmbuild/SPECS: rpmlint ../RPMS/ppc/cajun-jsonapi-devel-2.0.3-1.fc21.ppc.rpm ../SRPMS/cajun-jsonapi-2.0.3-1.fc21.src.rpm cajun-jsonapi-devel.ppc: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/cajun-jsonapi-devel/Readme.txt cajun-jsonapi-devel.ppc: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/cajun-jsonapi-devel/ReleaseNotes.txt
^^^ Please convert these files to UTF-8.
I mean Unix. Unix line endings.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1012337
Peter Lemenkov lemenkov@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #4 from Peter Lemenkov lemenkov@gmail.com --- Ok, I see that Daniel fixed everything. I don't see any other issues so this package is
APPROVED.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1012337
Peter Lemenkov lemenkov@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |daniel@pocock.com.au Flags| |needinfo?(daniel@pocock.com | |.au)
--- Comment #5 from Peter Lemenkov lemenkov@gmail.com --- Ping, Daniel! You didn't requested fedora-cvs flag yet.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1012337
Daniel Pocock daniel@pocock.com.au changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(daniel@pocock.com |needinfo+ fedora-cvs? |.au) |
--- Comment #6 from Daniel Pocock daniel@pocock.com.au --- Sorry, I didn't realise, the flag is set to "?" now
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1012337
--- Comment #7 from Peter Lemenkov lemenkov@gmail.com --- (In reply to Daniel Pocock from comment #6)
Sorry, I didn't realise, the flag is set to "?" now
Daniel, that's still not enough :). You need to fill this template and post it as well:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_SCM_admin_requests#New_Packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1012337
Daniel Pocock daniel@pocock.com.au changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo+ |needinfo-
--- Comment #8 from Daniel Pocock daniel@pocock.com.au --- New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: cajun-jsonapi Short Description: cross-platform C++ header library for JSON Owners: pocock Branches: f19 f20 el6 InitialCC:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1012337
Peter Lemenkov lemenkov@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo- |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1012337
Jon Ciesla limburgher@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1012337
--- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla limburgher@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests).
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1012337
--- Comment #10 from Peter Lemenkov lemenkov@gmail.com --- Daniel, it looks that you forgot to submit cajun-jsonapi package for EL6:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/search/cajun-jsonapi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1012337
--- Comment #11 from Daniel Pocock daniel@pocock.com.au ---
I had tried to but I get an error from
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/new/
it says
"cajun-jsonapi-2.0.3-1.el6 not tagged as an update candidate"
Do I need to make some extra tag? It already appears to be tagged. Do I need to wait for it to be stable in Fedora before it can propagate to EPEL or do I need to request some additional approval for it?
It is in the repository for EPEL6
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/cajun-jsonapi.git/tree/?h=el6
and it is built on EPEL6:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=489563
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1012337
Peter Lemenkov lemenkov@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE Last Closed| |2016-03-03 11:28:37
--- Comment #12 from Peter Lemenkov lemenkov@gmail.com --- Ok, closing this - the package was built long time ago.
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org