[Bug 226558] New: Merge Review: xfsprogs

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226558

Summary: Merge Review: xfsprogs
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: [e-mail]
        ReportedBy: [e-mail]
         QAContact: [e-mail]
                CC: [e-mail]

Fedora Merge Review: xfsprogs

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/xfsprogs/
Initial Owner: [e-mail]

[Bug 226558] Merge Review: xfsprogs

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: xfsprogs

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226558

------- Additional Comments From [e-mail]  2007-01-31 16:32 EST -------
I hereby disclaim all package ownership (and the same goes for jfsutils and
reiserfsutils).

[Bug 226558] Merge Review: xfsprogs

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: xfsprogs

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226558

------- Additional Comments From [e-mail]  2007-01-31 19:44 EST -------
(In reply to comment #0)
> Fedora Merge Review: xfsprogs

You are already the package owner, as can be seen here:
> Initial Owner: [e-mail]

[Bug 226558] Merge Review: xfsprogs

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: xfsprogs

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226558

------- Additional Comments From [e-mail]  2007-02-01 03:46 EST -------
I've been ignoring that package for well over a year, and will continue to
ignore it.  It was assigned to me by someone else in a long-ago bombing run.

[Bug 226558] Merge Review: xfsprogs

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: xfsprogs

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226558

------- Additional Comments From [e-mail]  2007-02-01 03:57 EST -------
Cool... I don't think anyone foreseen such a possibility.

So, should we use the orphaning procedure or what?

[Bug 226558] Merge Review: xfsprogs

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: xfsprogs

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226558

------- Additional Comments From [e-mail]  2007-02-01 05:00 EST -------
That's as good an idea as any, I suppose.

The Extras community is probably far better suited to maintaining
{xfs,reiserfs,jfs}utils packages than a Red Hatter anyway, because RH does not
support the filesystems in question.

[Bug 226558] Merge Review: xfsprogs

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: xfsprogs

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226558

------- Additional Comments From [e-mail]  2007-02-02 10:33 EST -------
I could pick that up, but I'm not sure what the procedure is.

[Bug 226558] Merge Review: xfsprogs

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: xfsprogs

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226558

[e-mail] changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |[e-mail],
                   |                            |[e-mail]

------- Additional Comments From [e-mail]  2007-02-04 10:16 EST -------
We've also got one of the XFS developers who was interested in taking this package over... Eric?

[Bug 226558] Merge Review: xfsprogs

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: xfsprogs

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226558

------- Additional Comments From [e-mail]  2007-02-04 10:44 EST -------
Sure I'll pick up xfsprogs and should try to get xfsdump in from extras too, I
suppose.
Jarod, expect questions from me :)

[Bug 226558] Merge Review: xfsprogs

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: xfsprogs

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226558

[e-mail] changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |[e-mail]

------- Additional Comments From [e-mail]  2007-02-04 15:15 EST -------
Looks like Russel has done the last few updates to xfsprogs, so we should probably poke him too...

Axel, any objections to either Eric or Russell taking it over? Based on the changelog, this was originally 
pulled in from your packages, but both Eric and Russell come from SGI and still actively work on the XFS 
code...

[Bug 226558] Merge Review: xfsprogs

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: xfsprogs

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226558

[e-mail] changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|[e-mail]       |

------- Additional Comments From [e-mail]  2007-02-04 15:22 EST -------
Sure, I hadn't noticed that Eric and Russel were at RH now, they are both far
better suited for any XFS bits than I am.

[Bug 226558] Merge Review: xfsprogs

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: xfsprogs

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226558

------- Additional Comments From [e-mail]  2007-02-04 17:39 EST -------

I just updated fc5 fc6 and fc7 to xfsprogs 2.8.18

[Bug 226558] Merge Review: xfsprogs

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: xfsprogs

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226558

[e-mail] changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Severity|normal                      |medium
           Priority|normal                      |medium
            Product|Fedora Extras               |Fedora

[e-mail] changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|                            |fedora-cvs?

------- Additional Comments From [e-mail]  2007-06-20 13:24 EST -------
Package Change Request
======================
Package Name: xfsprogs
Updated Fedora Owners: [e-mail],[e-mail]

[Bug 226558] Merge Review: xfsprogs

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: xfsprogs

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226558

[e-mail] changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |[e-mail]
               Flag|fedora-cvs?                 |fedora-cvs-

------- Additional Comments From [e-mail]  2007-06-20 16:50 EST -------
[e-mail] doesn't seem to be a valid account system email. 
Should that be @redhat.com? Can you check and re-request?

[Bug 226558] Merge Review: xfsprogs

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: xfsprogs

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226558

[e-mail] changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |RAWHIDE
               Flag|fedora-cvs-                 |

------- Additional Comments From [e-mail]  2007-09-12 11:06 EST -------
closing this until cattelan has a fedora acct.  AFAIK I'm the lucky new owner of
xfsprogs, now.