[Bug 208250] New: Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers
7:32 a.m.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208250
Summary: Review Request: piklab - Development environment for
applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers
Product: Fedora Extras
Version: devel
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: normal
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: aportal(a)univ-montp2.fr
QAContact: fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com
Spec URL: http://linuxelectronique.free.fr/download/fedora/5/SPECS/piklab.spec
SRPM URL:
http://linuxelectronique.free.fr/download/fedora/5/SRPMS/piklab-0.11.3-1....
Description: Piklab is a graphic development environment for PIC and dsPIC
microcontrollers. It interfaces with various toochains for compiling and assembling and it
supports several Microchip and direct programmers.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
1:54 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 208250] Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC
and dsPIC microcontrollers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208250
------- Additional Comments From Jochen(a)herr-schmitt.de 2006-09-27 14:54 EST -------
Good:
+ Local build works fine.
+ Local install/uninstall works fine.
+ Program starts without complains.
+ Tar ball in source package matches with upstream.
+ Mock build works fine.
Bad:
- Rpmlint of source package complaints:
pmlint piklab-0.11.3-1.src.rpm
E: piklab summary-too-long Development environment for applications based on PIC
and dsPIC microcontrollers
E: piklab unknown-key GPG#8d4d7450
W: piklab strange-permission piklab-0.11.3.desktop.typo-fr.patch 0600
W: piklab strange-permission piklab-0.11.3.x-desktop-fr.patch 0600
W: piklab strange-permission piklab.spec 0600
W: piklab mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 51, tab: line 3)
- rpmlint complains on binary rpm:
E: piklab summary-too-long Development environment for applications based on PIC
and dsPIC microcontrollers
W: piklab dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/piklab/common
../doc/common
/tmp/piklab-0.11.3-1.i686.rpm.18087/usr/share/applications/kde/piklab.desktop:
warning: file contains key "DocPath", this key is currently reserved for use
within KDE, and should in the future KDE releases be prefixed by "X-"
- Please use http://switch.dl.sourceforge.net/..., so spectool will work
properly.
- Qt environment variable was not sourced.
- Duplicate BuildRequires: libart_lgpl-devel (by kdelibs-devel), fam-devel (by
kdelibs-devel)
- BuildRequires: gettext is missing (required to build the translations)
- Rpmlint complains on installed package:
E: piklab summary-too-long Development environment for applications based on PIC
and dsPIC microcontrollers
W: piklab dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/piklab/common
../doc/common
//usr/share/applications/kde/piklab.desktop: warning: file contains key
"DocPath", this key is currently reserved for use within KDE, and should in the
future KDE releases be prefixed by "X-"
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
6:46 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 208250] Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC
and dsPIC microcontrollers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208250
aportal(a)univ-montp2.fr changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |alain.portal(a)free.fr
------- Additional Comments From aportal(a)univ-montp2.fr 2006-09-28 07:46 EST -------
(In reply to comment #1)
Bad:
- Rpmlint of source package complaints:
pmlint piklab-0.11.3-1.src.rpm
E: piklab summary-too-long Development environment for applications based on
PIC
and dsPIC microcontrollers
I don't have this error with an uptodate rpmlint (0.78-1.fc5)
E: piklab unknown-key GPG#8d4d7450
This is my key, please import.
W: piklab strange-permission piklab-0.11.3.desktop.typo-fr.patch
0600
W: piklab strange-permission piklab-0.11.3.x-desktop-fr.patch 0600
W: piklab strange-permission piklab.spec 0600
OK.
W: piklab mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 51, tab: line 3)
It seems to me to not be really important.
- rpmlint complains on binary rpm:
E: piklab summary-too-long Development environment for applications based on
PIC
and dsPIC microcontrollers
ideem above
W: piklab dangling-relative-symlink
/usr/share/doc/HTML/en/piklab/common
../doc/common
I tried to get help about this warning, no real answer
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/2006-September/msg0078...
/tmp/piklab-0.11.3-1.i686.rpm.18087/usr/share/applications/kde/piklab.desktop:
warning: file contains key "DocPath", this key is currently reserved for use
within KDE, and should in the future KDE releases be prefixed by "X-"
This is a KDE application.
- Please use http://switch.dl.sourceforge.net/..., so spectool will
work
properly.
prdownloads.sourceforge.net don't do the same?
what spectool?
- Qt environment variable was not sourced.
Why sourcing Qt environment variables?
- Duplicate BuildRequires: libart_lgpl-devel (by kdelibs-devel),
fam-devel
(by
kdelibs-devel)
OK.
- BuildRequires: gettext is missing (required to build the
translations)
There is no translation in this package
- Rpmlint complains on installed package:
E: piklab summary-too-long Development environment for applications based on
PIC
and dsPIC microcontrollers
W: piklab
dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/piklab/common
../doc/common
> //usr/share/applications/kde/piklab.desktop: warning: file
contains key
> "DocPath", this key is currently reserved for use within KDE, and should in
the
future KDE releases be prefixed by "X-"
Idem above
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
8:25 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 208250] Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC
and dsPIC microcontrollers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208250
------- Additional Comments From aportal(a)univ-montp2.fr 2006-09-28 09:25 EST -------
Spec URL: http://linuxelectronique.free.fr/download/fedora/5/SPECS/piklab.spec
SRPM URL:
http://linuxelectronique.free.fr/download/fedora/5/SRPMS/piklab-0.11.3-2....
%changelog
* Thu Sep 28 2006 Alain Portal <aportal[AT]univ-montp2[DOT]fr> 0.11.3-2
- Remove duplicate BR
- Fix files permissions
- Improve download URL
- Don't mis space and tab
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
12:57 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 208250] Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC
and dsPIC microcontrollers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208250
------- Additional Comments From mtasaka(a)ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-28 13:57 EST
-------
Created an attachment (id=137327)
--> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=137327&action=...)
mockbuild log of piklab-0.11.3-2
Alain, can you rebuild piklab-0.11.3-2 correctly?
I tried under FC6-devel i386 mock, but it failed.
Would you check my build log?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
1:20 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 208250] Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC
and dsPIC microcontrollers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208250
------- Additional Comments From alain.portal(a)free.fr 2006-09-28 14:20 EST -------
(In reply to comment #4)
Created an attachment (id=137327)
-->
(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=137327&action=...) [edit]
mockbuild log of piklab-0.11.3-2
Alain, can you rebuild piklab-0.11.3-2 correctly?
I'll do that tomorrow at work, my home computer isn't powerfull
I tried under FC6-devel i386 mock, but it failed.
Strange, build fine on an uptodate FC5
Would you check my build log?
Yes, please.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
1:37 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 208250] Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC
and dsPIC microcontrollers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208250
------- Additional Comments From Jochen(a)herr-schmitt.de 2006-09-28 14:37 EST -------
Bad:
- Don't sourced QT environment variables.
(this should make sure, that the build runs agains the right Qt version)
- Rpmlint complaints on binary rpm:
E: piklab summary-too-long Development environment for applications based on PIC
and dsPIC microcontrollers
W: piklab dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/piklab/common
../doc/common
/tmp/piklab-0.11.3-2.i686.rpm.5998/usr/share/applications/kde/piklab.desktop:
warning: file contains key "DocPath", this key is currently reserved for use
within KDE, and should in the future KDE releases be prefixed by "X-"
BTW: I use rpmlint-0.78-1
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
2 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 208250] Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC
and dsPIC microcontrollers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208250
------- Additional Comments From alain.portal(a)free.fr 2006-09-28 15:00 EST -------
(In reply to comment #6)
Bad:
- Don't sourced QT environment variables.
(this should make sure, that the build runs agains the right Qt version)
This isn't needed.
- Rpmlint complaints on binary rpm:
E: piklab summary-too-long Development environment for applications based on
PIC
and dsPIC microcontrollers
I don't have this error!
Mamoru, please, could you confirm?
W: piklab dangling-relative-symlink
/usr/share/doc/HTML/en/piklab/common
../doc/common
/tmp/piklab-0.11.3-2.i686.rpm.5998/usr/share/applications/kde/piklab.desktop:
warning: file contains key "DocPath", this key is currently reserved for use
within KDE, and should in the future KDE releases be prefixed by "X-"
Why do you want I make a better package than you?
rpmlint kyum-0.7.5-4.fc6.i386.rpm
W: kyum
dangling-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/kyum/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common
W: kyum
symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/kyum/common
/usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common
E: kyum non-executable-script /usr/share/apps/kyum/kyum_sysinfo.py 0644
E: kyum zero-length /usr/share/doc/kyum-0.7.5/README
/tmp/kyum-0.7.5-4.fc6.i386.rpm.3618/usr/share/applications/kde/fedora-kyum.desktop:
warning: file contains key "DocPath", this key is currently reserved for use
within KDE, and should in the future KDE releases be prefixed by "X-"
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
2:11 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 208250] Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC
and dsPIC microcontrollers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208250
------- Additional Comments From mtasaka(a)ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-28 15:11 EST
-------
(In reply to comment #7)
(In reply to comment #6)
> Bad:
>
> - Don't sourced QT environment variables.
> (this should make sure, that the build runs agains the right Qt version)
This isn't needed.
I also think this is not needed because the files under
/etc/profile.d
is "source"d even without explicitly sourced. Actually many packages
using Qt don't source Qt environ explicitly, this can be seen under:
http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/logs/fedora-development-extras/
> - Rpmlint complaints on binary rpm:
> E: piklab summary-too-long Development environment for applications based on
PIC
> and dsPIC microcontrollers
I don't have this error!
Mamoru, please, could you confirm?
I HAVE. "rpmlint -I summary-too-long" says summary must be less than
80 characters (not longer than 79), however, this summary seems to
have just 80 characters......
> W: piklab dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/piklab/common
> ../doc/common
This warning is not a problem because kdelibs is installed together
and it corrects this.
>
/tmp/piklab-0.11.3-2.i686.rpm.5998/usr/share/applications/kde/piklab.desktop:
> warning: file contains key "DocPath", this key is currently reserved for
use
> within KDE, and should in the future KDE releases be prefixed by "X-"
Why do you want I make a better package than you?
I think this can be ignored.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
2:15 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 208250] Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC
and dsPIC microcontrollers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208250
------- Additional Comments From mtasaka(a)ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-28 15:14 EST
-------
And....
(In reply to comment #5)
(In reply to comment #4)
> Created an attachment (id=137327)
-->
(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=137327&action=...) [edit]
[edit]
> mockbuild log of piklab-0.11.3-2
>
> Alain, can you rebuild piklab-0.11.3-2 correctly?
I'll do that tomorrow at work, my home computer isn't powerfull
> I tried under FC6-devel i386 mock, but it failed.
Strange, build fine on an uptodate FC5
I checked under FC5 i386_smp mockbuild and it surely succeeded,
strange.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
3:17 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 208250] Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC
and dsPIC microcontrollers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208250
------- Additional Comments From alain.portal(a)free.fr 2006-09-28 16:17 EST -------
In your attachement, I found:
checking readline/readline.h usability... yes
checking readline/readline.h presence... yes
checking for readline/readline.h... yes
checking for rl_initialize... configure: WARNING: libreadline not found
Perhaps it is a problem between versions
FC5 : readline-5.0
FC6 : readline-5.1
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
3:31 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 208250] Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC
and dsPIC microcontrollers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208250
------- Additional Comments From alain.portal(a)free.fr 2006-09-28 16:31 EST -------
Under FC5:
checking readline/readline.h usability... yes
checking readline/readline.h presence... yes
checking for readline/readline.h... yes
checking for rl_initialize... yes
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
5:39 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 208250] Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC
and dsPIC microcontrollers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208250
------- Additional Comments From alain.portal(a)free.fr 2006-09-28 18:39 EST -------
Upstream report me a possible problem, libncurses seems not be detected
your log:
checking for main in -lcurses... no
checking for main in -lncurses... no
checking readline/readline.h usability... yes
FC5:
hecking for main in -lcurses... yes
checking readline/readline.h usability... yes
checking readline/readline.h presence... yes
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
11:57 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 208250] Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC
and dsPIC microcontrollers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208250
------- Additional Comments From mtasaka(a)ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-29 00:57 EST
-------
(In reply to comment #12)
Upstream report me a possible problem, libncurses seems not be
detected
your log:
checking for main in -lcurses... no
checking for main in -lncurses... no
checking readline/readline.h usability... yes
FC5:
hecking for main in -lcurses... yes
checking readline/readline.h usability... yes
checking readline/readline.h presence... yes
Good catch, thanks. Actually, adding "ncurses-devel" for BR
seems to work for FC6-devel i386 mockbuild.
From changelog of ncurses rpm:
* Sat Jul 08 2006 Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar(a)redhat.com> 5.5-20
- update to patch 20060701
- don't strip libraries, chmod +x them
- move .so links to devel package
- add gpm-devel to buildrequires
- spec cleanup
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
2:23 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 208250] Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC
and dsPIC microcontrollers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208250
------- Additional Comments From aportal(a)univ-montp2.fr 2006-09-29 03:23 EST -------
The problem is to know if I have to add this BR or if this BR is missing in a
package from which pikloop depends.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
2:25 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 208250] Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC
and dsPIC microcontrollers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208250
------- Additional Comments From aportal(a)univ-montp2.fr 2006-09-29 03:25 EST -------
(In reply to comment #14)
The problem is to know if I have to add this BR or if this BR is
missing in
a
package from which pikloop depends.
piklab of course :-)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
3:16 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 208250] Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC
and dsPIC microcontrollers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208250
mtasaka(a)ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |mtasaka(a)ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp
OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778
nThis| |
------- Additional Comments From mtasaka(a)ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-29 04:16 EST
-------
(In reply to comment #15)
(In reply to comment #14)
> The problem is to know if I have to add this BR or if this BR is missing in
a
> package from which pikloop depends.
piklab of course :-)
Well, configure requests the existence of -lcurses.
in FC5, this is in ncurses, which are installed by minimal buildroot.
However, in FC6, libcurses.so is moved to ncurses-devel.
So you have to add ncurses-devel to BuildRequires and the problem
for rebuilding is resolved.
I have not yet reviewed this fully, however,
* rpmlint complaints about long summary. It says that summary should
have no longer than 79 characters.
* Please add "ncurses-devel" to BuildRequiers (this should be no problem
for FC5, too).
* Perhaps /etc/security/consoles.perms.d/ should be
/etc/security/console.perms.d/ ? (the latter is owned by pam)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
3:42 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 208250] Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC
and dsPIC microcontrollers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208250
------- Additional Comments From aportal(a)univ-montp2.fr 2006-09-29 04:42 EST -------
(In reply to comment #16)
(In reply to comment #15)
> (In reply to comment #14)
> > The problem is to know if I have to add this BR or if this BR is missing
in
> a
> > package from which pikloop depends.
>
> piklab of course :-)
Well, configure requests the existence of -lcurses.
in FC5, this is in ncurses, which are installed by minimal buildroot.
However, in FC6, libcurses.so is moved to ncurses-devel.
So you have to add ncurses-devel to BuildRequires and the problem
for rebuilding is resolved.
I have not yet reviewed this fully, however,
* rpmlint complaints about long summary. It says that summary should
have no longer than 79 characters.
I really don't understand, my rpmlint don't complaints!
I'll fix...
* Please add "ncurses-devel" to BuildRequiers (this should
be no problem
for FC5, too).
Before doing this change, I'm waiting one hour or two for an answer to my
question on Extras list.
* Perhaps /etc/security/consoles.perms.d/ should be
/etc/security/console.perms.d/ ? (the latter is owned by pam)
Oups, you're right, it's a typo.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
4:03 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 208250] Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC
and dsPIC microcontrollers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208250
------- Additional Comments From aportal(a)univ-montp2.fr 2006-09-29 05:03 EST -------
Spec URL: http://linuxelectronique.free.fr/download/fedora/5/SPECS/piklab.spec
SRPM URL:
http://linuxelectronique.free.fr/download/fedora/5/SRPMS/piklab-0.11.3-3....
%changelog
* Wed Sep 29 2006 Alain Portal <aportal[AT]univ-montp2[DOT]fr> 0.11.3-3
- Add doc about how to complete full feature installation
- Fix typo on security pathname
- Short summary
- Add BR ncurses-devel for FC6
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
5:57 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 208250] Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC
and dsPIC microcontrollers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208250
------- Additional Comments From mtasaka(a)ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-29 06:57 EST
-------
Okay. Full review for piklab.
1. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines
* Use rpmlint
W: piklab dangling-relative-symlink \
/usr/share/doc/HTML/en/piklab/common ../doc/common
- Well, this warning itself is no problem, however, the problem
is that this symlink is broken.
Perhaps this should point to ../common .
2. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines :
= Nothing.
3. Other things I have noticed:
- Well,
/etc/security/console.perms.d/pickit1.perms
/etc/security/console.perms.d/pickit2.perms
These two files are same. Acutally spec file says:
%{__install} -pm 644 %{SOURCE3} \
%{buildroot}%{_sysconfdir}/security/console.perms.d/pickit1.perms
%{__install} -pm 644 %{SOURCE3} \
%{buildroot}%{_sysconfdir}/security/console.perms.d/pickit2.perms
I suspect only one of these two are necessary.
Also, while this is not documented, the files under
/etc/security/console.perms.d/ seem to have the names like
<number>-<specific name>.perms (like 50-default.perms).
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
6:20 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 208250] Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC
and dsPIC microcontrollers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208250
------- Additional Comments From aportal(a)univ-montp2.fr 2006-09-29 07:20 EST -------
(In reply to comment #19)
Okay. Full review for piklab.
1. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines
* Use rpmlint
W: piklab dangling-relative-symlink \
/usr/share/doc/HTML/en/piklab/common ../doc/common
- Well, this warning itself is no problem, however, the problem
is that this symlink is broken.
Perhaps this should point to ../common .
No. KDE recently changed /usr/share/doc/HTML/$LANG/common
in /usr/share/doc/HTML/$LANG/docs/common.
See
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/2006-September/msg0079...
and some follow up.
2. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines :
= Nothing.
3. Other things I have noticed:
- Well,
/etc/security/console.perms.d/pickit1.perms
/etc/security/console.perms.d/pickit2.perms
These two files are same. Acutally spec file says:
%{__install} -pm 644 %{SOURCE3} \
%{buildroot}%{_sysconfdir}/security/console.perms.d/pickit1.perms
%{__install} -pm 644 %{SOURCE3} \
%{buildroot}%{_sysconfdir}/security/console.perms.d/pickit2.perms
I suspect only one of these two are necessary.
No, this is an error, the second should be %{SOURCE4}
Also, while this is not documented, the files under
/etc/security/console.perms.d/ seem to have the names like
<number>-<specific name>.perms (like 50-default.perms).
I don't know how to choose a number.
This configuration is taken from http://piklab.sourceforge.net/support.php
section "for distributions using udev and PAM.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
7:18 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 208250] Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC
and dsPIC microcontrollers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208250
------- Additional Comments From mtasaka(a)ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-29 08:18 EST
-------
(In reply to comment #20)
(In reply to comment #19)
> /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/piklab/common ../doc/common
> - Well, this warning itself is no problem, however, the problem
> is that this symlink is broken.
> Perhaps this should point to ../common .
No. KDE recently changed /usr/share/doc/HTML/$LANG/common
in /usr/share/doc/HTML/$LANG/docs/common.
Well, then what package owns /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/docs/common
_NOW_ ? I use rawhide, and the newest rawhide kdelibs-3.5.4-6.fc6
owns /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common, however, my system doesn't have
/usr/share/doc/HTML/en/docs/common directory.
So my opinition is:
* If some package actually owns /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/docs/common,
this package should require the package (I am now trying to search
for it by yum, however for some reason I don't know yum is very
slow for now!!)
* If no package owns the directory _NOW_,
/usr/share/doc/HTML/en/piklab/common should point to ../common
as before till some package gets to own /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/docs/common.
> 3. Other things I have noticed:
> - Well,
>
> /etc/security/console.perms.d/pickit1.perms
> /etc/security/console.perms.d/pickit2.perms
>
> These two files are same. Acutally spec file says:
> %{__install} -pm 644 %{SOURCE3} \
> %{buildroot}%{_sysconfdir}/security/console.perms.d/pickit1.perms
> %{__install} -pm 644 %{SOURCE3} \
> %{buildroot}%{_sysconfdir}/security/console.perms.d/pickit2.perms
>
No, this is an error, the second should be %{SOURCE4}
Okay. Just fix as it should be.
> Also, while this is not documented, the files under
> /etc/security/console.perms.d/ seem to have the names like
> <number>-<specific name>.perms (like 50-default.perms).
I don't know how to choose a number.
This configuration is taken from http://piklab.sourceforge.net/support.php
section "for distributions using udev and PAM.
This is not documented and you don't have to add the number if
you don't want to.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
8:03 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 208250] Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC
and dsPIC microcontrollers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208250
------- Additional Comments From mtasaka(a)ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-29 09:03 EST
-------
(In reply to comment #21)
Well, then what package owns /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/docs/common
_NOW_ ?
I finished searching for this by yum. The result is, no package
owns this (in rawhide).
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
8:05 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 208250] Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC
and dsPIC microcontrollers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208250
------- Additional Comments From aportal(a)univ-montp2.fr 2006-09-29 09:04 EST -------
(In reply to comment #21)
> No. KDE recently changed /usr/share/doc/HTML/$LANG/common
> in /usr/share/doc/HTML/$LANG/docs/common.
Well, then what package owns /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/docs/common
_NOW_ ? I use rawhide, and the newest rawhide kdelibs-3.5.4-6.fc6
owns /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common, however, my system doesn't have
/usr/share/doc/HTML/en/docs/common directory.
The /usr/share/doc/HTML/$LANG/docs/common is owned by kde-i18n-$LANG.
You right, as english is the default language /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common is
owned by kdelibs. But I thought that /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/docs/common was
owned by kde-i18n-English, but this package don't exist ;-)
This is the exception.
So, for all languages but english, common is in $LANG/docs/, for english, it
is in $LANG/
So my opinition is:
* If some package actually owns /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/docs/common,
this package should require the package (I am now trying to search
for it by yum, however for some reason I don't know yum is very
slow for now!!)
* If no package owns the directory _NOW_,
/usr/share/doc/HTML/en/piklab/common should point to ../common
as before till some package gets to
own /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/docs/common.
> > Also, while this is not documented, the files under
> > /etc/security/console.perms.d/ seem to have the names like
> > <number>-<specific name>.perms (like 50-default.perms).
>
> I don't know how to choose a number.
> This configuration is taken from http://piklab.sourceforge.net/support.php
> section "for distributions using udev and PAM.
This is not documented and you don't have to add the number if
you don't want to.
As I don't know choosing a number, I'll don't add. I'll see later when
I'll
get more informations.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
9:16 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 208250] Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC
and dsPIC microcontrollers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208250
------- Additional Comments From aportal(a)univ-montp2.fr 2006-09-29 10:16 EST -------
Spec URL: http://linuxelectronique.free.fr/download/fedora/5/SPECS/piklab.spec
SRPM URL:
http://linuxelectronique.free.fr/download/fedora/5/SRPMS/piklab-0.11.3-4....
%changelog
* Wed Sep 29 2006 Alain Portal <aportal[AT]univ-montp2[DOT]fr> 0.11.3-4
- Fix typo for installing pickit2.perms
- Add Application category in desktop file
- Fix symlink: english is the only language where common directory is in
LANG directory while for other, common is in LANG/docs directory
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
11:21 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 208250] Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC
and dsPIC microcontrollers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208250
mtasaka(a)ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779
nThis| |
------- Additional Comments From mtasaka(a)ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-29 12:20 EST
-------
Well, /etc/security/console.perms.d/pickit2.perms says:
-------------------------------------------------------------
<pickit2>=/dev/pickit2*
<console> 0600 <pickit2> 0600 roo
-------------------------------------------------------------
Perhaps the last word must be "root". Just fix it.
------------------------------------------------------------------
This package (piklab) is APPROVED by me.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
11:29 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 208250] Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC
and dsPIC microcontrollers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208250
------- Additional Comments From aportal(a)univ-montp2.fr 2006-09-29 12:28 EST -------
OK, really thanks for the review!
%changelog
* Fri Sep 29 2006 Alain Portal <aportal[AT]univ-montp2[DOT]fr> 0.11.3-5
- Fix typo in pickit2.perms
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
12:54 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 208250] Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC
and dsPIC microcontrollers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208250
aportal(a)univ-montp2.fr changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED
Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
11:14 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 208250] Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC
and dsPIC microcontrollers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208250
bugzilla(a)redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Severity|normal |medium
mtasaka(a)ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |cgoorah(a)yahoo.com.au
------- Additional Comments From mtasaka(a)ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-10 12:14 EST
-------
Chitlesh, if you want to take over the maintainship
and when Alain agrees, take a procedure according to
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
4:41 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 208250] Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC
and dsPIC microcontrollers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208250
------- Additional Comments From cgoorah(a)yahoo.com.au 2007-04-10 17:40 EST -------
Alain, could I take over ?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
7:14 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 208250] Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC
and dsPIC microcontrollers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208250
------- Additional Comments From alain.portal(a)free.fr 2007-04-11 08:14 EST -------
What have I to do?
I can't access to the link
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure
I get a 502 error
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
7:34 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 208250] Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC
and dsPIC microcontrollers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208250
------- Additional Comments From mtasaka(a)ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-11 08:34 EST
-------
I can see the URL correctly. Still can't you access, Alain?
If still you cannot, please answer the following questions.
* Would you want to be a co-maintainer?
* Would you want to be in a CC-list?
* Or would you want to make your name completely removed from
piklab owner list?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
7:45 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 208250] Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC
and dsPIC microcontrollers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208250
------- Additional Comments From alain.portal(a)free.fr 2007-04-11 08:45 EST -------
(In reply to comment #30)
I can see the URL correctly. Still can't you access, Alain?
Still have problem for all the site.
If still you cannot, please answer the following questions.
* Would you want to be a co-maintainer?
* Would you want to be in a CC-list?
* Or would you want to make your name completely removed from
piklab owner list?
After a discussion with Chitlesh, he become co-.
maintainer
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
8:05 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 208250] Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC
and dsPIC microcontrollers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208250
cgoorah(a)yahoo.com.au changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flag| |fedora-cvs?
------- Additional Comments From cgoorah(a)yahoo.com.au 2007-04-11 09:05 EST -------
Package Change Request
======================
Package Name: piklab
Updated Fedora Owners: cgoorah(a)yahoo.com.au, alain.portal(a)free.fr
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
2:52 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 208250] Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC
and dsPIC microcontrollers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208250
wtogami(a)redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
12:58 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 208250] Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC
and dsPIC microcontrollers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208250
bugzilla(a)redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Priority|normal |medium
------- Additional Comments From alain.portal(a)free.fr 2007-04-18 13:58 EST -------
Chitlesh,
I added a patch for fr.po, commited the files, tag the branch, but I can't
build from home. Please, could you do?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
3:37 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 208250] Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC
and dsPIC microcontrollers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208250
------- Additional Comments From cgoorah(a)yahoo.com.au 2007-04-19 04:37 EST -------
Done.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
1:42 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 208250] Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC
and dsPIC microcontrollers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208250
bugzilla(a)redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora
aportal(a)univ-montp2.fr changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs-
------- Additional Comments From aportal(a)univ-montp2.fr 2007-07-20 14:42 EST -------
Package Change Request
======================
Package Name: piklab
Updated Fedora Owners: alain.portal(a)free.fr
Please, add my home email in comps because I'm on vacation for 6 weeks.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
10:55 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 208250] Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC
and dsPIC microcontrollers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=208250
bugzilla(a)redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Version|devel |rawhide
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
1:21 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 208250] Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=208250
Alain PORTAL <aportal(a)univ-montp2.fr> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flag|fedora-cvs- |fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #36 from Alain PORTAL <aportal(a)univ-montp2.fr> 2010-02-08 14:21:50 EST
---
Package Change Request
======================
Package Name: piklab
New Branches: EL-5
Owners: dionysos
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
6:32 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 208250] Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=208250
Kevin Fenzi <kevin(a)tummy.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--- Comment #37 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin(a)tummy.com> 2010-02-08 19:32:44 EST ---
cvs done.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
5251
days inactive
6482
days old
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
40 comments
1 participants
participants (1)
-
Red Hat Bugzilla