Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: python-importlib - Backport of importlib.import_module() from Python 2.7
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=611040
Summary: Review Request: python-importlib - Backport of importlib.import_module() from Python 2.7 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fabian@bernewireless.net QAContact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: notting@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora
Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/python-importlib.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/python-importlib-1.0.2-1.fc13.src...
Project URL: http://pypi.python.org/pypi/importlib
Description: This package contains the code from importlib as found in Python 2.7. It is provided so that people who wish to use importlib.import_module() with a version of Python prior to 2.7 or in 3.0 have the function readily available. The code in no way deviates from what can be found in the 2.7 trunk.
Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2291821
rpmlint output: [fab@laptop011 SRPMS]$ rpmlint python-importlib-1.0.2-1.fc13.src.rpm python-importlib.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Backport -> Back port, Back-port, Backplate 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
[fab@laptop011 noarch]$ rpmlint python-importlib-1.0.2-1.fc13.noarch.rpm python-importlib.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Backport -> Back port, Back-port, Backplate 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=611040
Fabian Affolter fabian@bernewireless.net changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |611277
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=611040
Thomas Spura tomspur@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |dmalcolm@redhat.com, | |tomspur@fedoraproject.org AssignedTo|nobody@fedoraproject.org |tomspur@fedoraproject.org Flag| |fedora-review?
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Spura tomspur@fedoraproject.org 2010-07-05 09:45:12 EDT --- Don't you need at least a Conflicts with python(abi) = 2.7?
In python-celery you currently commented out the requires on this package, this could be resolved by e.g.:
%{!?pyver: %global pyver %(%{__python} -c "import sys ; print sys.version[:3]")} %if pyver < 2.7 Requires: python-importlib %endif
This way, when rebuilding all packages with python2.7 (or above) this will be cone automatic.
Furthermore, when using a conflicts on python2.7, this package won't being build in >= 2.7 and everyone will notice, that this can be a dead.package.
Do you (=Fabian) have another resolution for this, or David, what's your preference?
(Anything else looks fine at the first sign.)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=611040
Fabian Affolter fabian@bernewireless.net changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |python-importlib
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=611040
Fabian Affolter fabian@bernewireless.net changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX Last Closed| |2011-07-14 12:42:54
--- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter fabian@bernewireless.net 2011-07-14 12:42:54 EDT --- No, at the moment I have no time to work on this package.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=611040
Andrew Colin Kissa andrew@topdog.za.net changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |andrew@topdog.za.net Resolution|WONTFIX |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Colin Kissa andrew@topdog.za.net 2011-07-15 06:24:42 EDT ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 722427 ***
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org