Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: BareBonesBrowserLaunch - Simple library to launch a browser window from Java
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484279
Summary: Review Request: BareBonesBrowserLaunch - Simple library to launch a browser window from Java Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jmatthew@redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: notting@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: ---
Spec URL: http://jmatthews.fedorapeople.org/BareBonesBrowserLaunch/1.5/1/BareBonesBrow... SRPM URL: http://jmatthews.fedorapeople.org/BareBonesBrowserLaunch/1.5/1/BareBonesBrow... Description: Utility class to open a web page from a Swing application in the user's default browser. Supports: Mac OS X, GNU/Linux, Unix, Windows XP
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484279
John Matthews jmatthew@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dennis@ausil.us
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484279
John Matthews jmatthew@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |484281
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484279
--- Comment #1 from John Matthews jmatthew@redhat.com 2009-03-25 12:52:32 EDT --- Does anyone have time to review this? It's part of work required to get hadoop/nutch packaged.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484279
Dan Horák dan@danny.cz changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody@fedoraproject.org |dan@danny.cz
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484279
Dan Horák dan@danny.cz changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review?
--- Comment #2 from Dan Horák dan@danny.cz 2009-03-25 13:46:47 EDT --- formal review is here, see the notes below:
OK source files match upstream, checked with diff OK package meets naming and versioning guidelines. OK* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. OK dist tag is present. OK license field matches the actual license. OK license is open source-compatible. OK latest version is being packaged. OK BuildRequires are proper. N/A compiler flags are appropriate. OK %clean is present. OK package builds in mock (Rawhide/x86_64). N/A debuginfo package looks complete. OK rpmlint is silent. OK final provides and requires look sane. N/A %check is present and all tests pass. OK no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. OK owns the directories it creates. BAD doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. OK no duplicates in %files. OK* file permissions are appropriate. OK no scriptlets present. OK code, not content. OK documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. OK %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. OK no headers. OK no pkgconfig files. OK no libtool .la droppings. OK not a GUI app.
- move the *.class removal from %build to %prep - the %files section for the main package must contain only the *.jar, not the whole %{_javadir}, use %{_javadir}/* - use plain %defattr(-,root,root,-) for the javadoc subpackage - the javadoc documentation shouldn't be marked as %doc and %{_javadocdir}/%{name} directory should exist, other packages create this as a symlink to the versioned directory - all the points above are based on https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Java
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484279
Vedran Miletić rivanvx@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rivanvx@gmail.com Flag| |needinfo?(jmatthew@redhat.c | |om)
--- Comment #3 from Vedran Miletić rivanvx@gmail.com 2009-11-04 17:22:26 EDT --- Hi, is anyone working on this? I'm very interested in having Hadoop in Fedora, and willing to help it happen if I can.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484279
John Matthews jmatthew@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(jmatthew@redhat.c | |om) |
--- Comment #4 from John Matthews jmatthew@redhat.com 2009-11-12 10:35:18 EDT --- Hello Vedran,
If you would like to pick this up, and finish the packaging, feel free.
As to the work done for bringing Hadoop into Fedora. We created a wiki page for Spacewalk below, listing out the deps and what was needed, as you'll see this was for an older Nutch/Hadoop.
https://fedorahosted.org/spacewalk/wiki/GettingPackagesIntoFedora/Nutch
Regards, John
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484279
--- Comment #5 from Vedran Miletić rivanvx@gmail.com 2009-11-12 11:18:31 EDT --- Sure, I will look into it these days and see if I can do something.
Can Cloudera packages be helpful in this case?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484279
Orion Poplawski orion@cora.nwra.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |orion@cora.nwra.com
--- Comment #6 from Orion Poplawski orion@cora.nwra.com 2009-12-28 18:58:24 EDT --- How about this:
http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/BareBonesBrowserLaunch-2.0-1.fc12.src... http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/BareBonesBrowserLaunch.spec
* Mon Dec 28 2009 Orion Poplawski orion@cora.nwra.com 2.0-1 - Update to 2.0 - Use upstream jar source directly - Cleanup spec
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484279
--- Comment #7 from Dan Horák dan@danny.cz 2010-01-05 06:15:48 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6)
How about this:
http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/BareBonesBrowserLaunch-2.0-1.fc12.src... http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/BareBonesBrowserLaunch.spec
- Mon Dec 28 2009 Orion Poplawski orion@cora.nwra.com 2.0-1
- Update to 2.0
- Use upstream jar source directly
- Cleanup spec
Orion, do you want to step in as the submitter/maintainer?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484279
--- Comment #8 from Orion Poplawski orion@cora.nwra.com 2010-01-05 10:17:09 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7)
Orion, do you want to step in as the submitter/maintainer?
I'm happy to do so.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484279
--- Comment #9 from Dan Horák dan@danny.cz 2010-01-06 06:55:17 EDT --- Ok, then lets continue. All issues from comment #2 besides one are fixed in the latest spec file. What remains is non-existency of non-versioned directory with the javadoc documentation as written in the guidelines for Java packages. Adding a non-versioned symlink is also possible.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484279
--- Comment #10 from Orion Poplawski orion@cora.nwra.com 2010-01-06 10:42:56 EDT --- http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/BareBonesBrowserLaunch-2.0-2.fc12.src... http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/BareBonesBrowserLaunch.spec
* Wed Jan 6 2010 Orion Poplawski orion@cora.nwra.com 2.0-2 - Unversion javadoc dir
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484279
Dan Horák dan@danny.cz changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #11 from Dan Horák dan@danny.cz 2010-01-06 10:52:08 EDT --- Thanks, the package is now APPROVED.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484279
Orion Poplawski orion@cora.nwra.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #12 from Orion Poplawski orion@cora.nwra.com 2010-01-06 11:07:53 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: BareBonesBrowserLaunch Short Description: Simple library to launch a browser window from Java Owners: orion Branches: F-12 F-11 EL-5 InitialCC:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484279
Kevin Fenzi kevin@tummy.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--- Comment #13 from Kevin Fenzi kevin@tummy.com 2010-01-06 16:33:52 EDT --- cvs done.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484279
Orion Poplawski orion@cora.nwra.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE
--- Comment #14 from Orion Poplawski orion@cora.nwra.com 2010-01-06 16:48:47 EDT --- Checked in and built. Updates to follow shortly. Thanks all...
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org