Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=554090
Jussi Lehtola jussi.lehtola@iki.fi changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola@iki.fi
--- Comment #4 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.lehtola@iki.fi 2010-01-31 07:15:43 EST --- (In reply to comment #2)
(In reply to comment #1)
I'm fairly sure I remember seeing a requirement that the Group: tag come from the official list in /usr/share/doc/rpm-*/GROUPS, but I can't find that in the packaging guidellines now, and the Sugar packaging guidelines use Sugar/Activities just as you have, so I guess that's allowed.
That statement is in the Creating Packages HOWTO. I don't think that there is an official guideline about this. Since the Group: tag doesn't have much meaning anymore as comps are used in package selection, instead, you really should use standard RPM groups, as you will get unnecessary rpmlint warnings if you don't...
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org