https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1887453
Bug ID: 1887453 Summary: Review Request: richacl - Rich Access Control List utilities and dynamic library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Assignee: nobody@fedoraproject.org Reporter: elvin.sindrilaru@cern.ch QA Contact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora
Spec URL: http://storage-ci.web.cern.ch/storage-ci/eos/citrine-depend/el-8/SRPM/richac... SRPM URL: http://storage-ci.web.cern.ch/storage-ci/eos/citrine-depend/el-8/SRPM/richac... Description: Rich Access Control Lists: utilities and dynamic library Fedora Account System Username: esindril Blocks: FE-NEEDSPONSOR
Hi,
Could you please review the following package for inclusion in EPEL8? It already exists in EPEL7 and Fedora releases but it's missing from CentOS8. This is exactly the same version included in EPEL7 and Fedora releases i.e. 1.12-1.
Successful build for EPEL8: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=53288539
This is the first time I push a package for review, therefore I am in need for a sponsor.
Thank you!
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1887453
Elvin Sindrilaru elvin.sindrilaru@cern.ch changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841 [Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a sponsor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1887453
Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 zebob.m@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED CC| |zebob.m@gmail.com Resolution|--- |NOTABUG Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Last Closed| |2020-11-06 05:54:05
--- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 zebob.m@gmail.com --- If the package already exists in Fedora, you don't need a re-review, you need instead to contact the maintainer to ask them to package it for EPEL8.
I suggest you file a bug requesting it here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Fedora&component=richa...
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org