Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488105
Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka(a)ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flag| |fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #2 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka(a)ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-03-04 05:07:31
EDT ---
Thank you for a quick review!
(In reply to comment #1)
? The other rubygem packages have BR: ruby(rubygems). This one has
BR:
rubygems. Why is there a difference? Does it matter?
- No deference, however I
prefer to use ruby(rubygems) so I will
switch to ruby(rubugems)
Also BR: ruby(abi) =
%{rubyabi} will be pulled up by BR: rubygems. Do we really need to specify it
specifically? I know the guidelines tell us to do so.
- I usually add this abi
dependency for BR explicitly to make it
consistent with Requires of ruby abi dependency.
! The ruby guidelines tell us to use %global instead of %define.
While it
doesn't matter much in this case, it would be good to obey the guidelines.
-
Will change.
-----------------------------------------------------
New Package CVS Request
=======================
Package Name: rubygem-htmlentities
Short Description: A module for encoding and decoding (X)HTML entities
Owners: mtasaka
Branches: F-10 F-9
InitialCC: (nobody)
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.