Christopher Stone wrote:
On 10/18/06, Tom 'spot' Callaway <tcallawa(a)redhat.com>
> I even think it would be more productive to highlight the FC or
> FE packages that atrpms is providing overrides for, and start a
> discussion around why these packages exist, and if there exists the
> possibility to merge the changes into the FC or FE package and retire
> the atrpms packages. I'm sure that Axel would welcome that discussion,
> as less packages means less work for him. :)
I have filed over one-hundred bugs a month ago, and while some Fedora
users made an effort to try and reduce the conflicts, Axel has not
made a single response to a single bug report.
spot's suggestion was to start a (constructive) dialog regarding this issue.
IMO, mass-filing formletter-type bugs is certainly no way to go about that,
and I'm not a bit surprised by Axel's (non)response.