----- "Pierre-Yves Chibon" <pingou(a)pingoured.fr> wrote:
Some reviewers already tried to harmonize this:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710386#c1
Using this approach:
"""
These extensions were built as subpackages of the main package
"gnome-shell-extensions", and so named
"gnome-shell-extensions-<foo>",
as defined in the guidelines.
It seemed logical to me to refer to "third-party" extensions under
the
name "gnome-shell-extension-<bar>", since the package would provide
only
one extension "a priori". Maybe we'll need to specify guidelines for
such extensions, becoming more numerous.
"""
(see comment 3 of the same bug report).
This sounds like a valid approach to me.
A single element is not plural. End users are not going to know the
difference between the "subpackages of the main package" and third
party extensions, until this moment I did not so I had to look in to it
myself. It seems the the "extensions" name is coming from the git repo
where gnome has multiple extensions stored/developed. On the GnomeShell
Extensions[1] page it describes the "gnome-shell-extension-tool" again
a single extension with out the plural name.
[1]
https://live.gnome.org/GnomeShell/Extensions
-- Bob
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Robert 'Bob' Jensen || Fedora Unity Founder |
| bob(a)fedoraunity.org ||
http://fedoraunity.org/ |
|
http://bjensen.fedorapeople.org/ |
|
http://blogs.fedoraunity.org/bobjensen |
|
http://www.facebook.com/rpjensen |
------------------------------------------------------------------------