On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 10:42:17PM +0100, Enrico Scholz wrote:
> Maybe we need a minimal assumed runtime environment just like
> define a minimal assumed build evironment?
What's wrong with the current situation that we need such a change?
Because as it stands now the OP's question on whether to add coreutils
as a dependency is valid and would have to be positively confirmed. Or
rephrased: the current situation is that the practice and the
guidelines diverge and we need to fix one of them.
> The definition of such a beast would be the minimal set of
> that are needed to do anything sensible, for example everything that
> is pulled in by redhat-lsb (which includes coreutils).
Hahaha... Why not just add KDE and openoffice to the base environment?
Because they are too big? Hohoho.
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net