Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 09:59:52AM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 08:53:58AM -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
>>> In my personal descending order of preference I would do one of these:
>>> Version: 0
>>> Release: 1.rNNN
>> Thanks ..
>>
>> For the moment I've used:
>>
>> Version: 0.1
>> Release: 0.1.r11
> What issue are you trying to solve by this choice?
>
> You are not solving anything.
I don't understand what you mean.
Let me turn my question around: Why can't you directly use the upstream
version?
Ralf