On 06/16/2010 06:44 PM, Mamoru Tasaka wrote:
Jason L Tibbitts III wrote, at 06/17/2010 12:37 AM +9:00:
>>>>>> "RD" == Rex Dieter<rdieter(a)math.unl.edu>
> RD> See tracking bug, https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=604169
> RD> Seems an enterprising soul mass-filed bugs arguing packages placing
> RD> content under /usr/share/gtk-doc doesn't necessarily need to
> RD> Requires: gtk-doc
> Do the guidelines not already cover this case?
> "Multiple packages own files in a common directory but none of them
> needs to require the others."
> All of the packages should simply own /usr/share/gtk-doc.
# repoquery --whatprovides '/usr/share/gtk-doc/html/*' | sort | cat -n
currently returns *206 packages* and making all of them own
/usr/share/gtk-doc/html must clearly regarded as a bug in the packaging
in the distibution
Why? Sounds perfectly reasonable to me.
As /usr/share/gtk-doc/html is so common
No it's not
"so common", it's just one directory amongst many.