On Wed, 2007-03-28 at 15:09 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
>>>>> "JW" == Jarod Wilson
<jwilson(a)redhat.com> writes:
JW> I'd like to package up Maia Mailguard, and the license appears to
JW> be original BSD (advertising clause included) with a branding
JW> extension added. Thoughts?
In a way it's sort of like the GFDL with its invariant section. I
personally think that kind of thing renders the software "non-free",
but I'm not a lawyer.
Not sure if that license is free, to me it stinks, but in any case the
GFDL is a Documentation License, not a Software License, let's keep
apples to apples comparisons, and let's try to not get infected by the
Debian disease about defining what is software.
Simo.