On Mon, 2008-03-10 at 16:14 +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
On Monday, 10 March 2008 at 15:24, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >In one OCaml package:
> > BZ: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434630
> > spec: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-perl4caml.spec
> > On the other hand, maybe I should be allowed to
> > include an rpath in this situation because I really always want to be
> > linked to that particular libperl.so
> This is a case where rpath usage is acceptable, imo.
I wonder why libperl is not a proper library then. I see that it has no SONAME.
Are there any plans upstream to make it a proper library?
Not that I'm aware of. IMHO, this is a valid rpath exception case.