Re: [Fedora-packaging] rawhide report: 20110107 changes
On Fri, 2011-01-07 at 18:06 +0100, Thomas Spura wrote:
On Fri, 07 Jan 2011 10:01:17 -0500
seth vidal wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-01-07 at 09:35 -0500, Andre Robatino wrote:
> > Updating python on x86_64 tries to pull in 32-bit packages
> > (including one i386):
> >
> > [root@localhost ~]# yum update python
> > Loaded plugins: downloadonly, langpacks, presto, refresh-packagekit,
> > security
> > Adding en_US to language list
> > Setting up Update Process
> > Resolving Dependencies
> > --> Running transaction check
> > ---> Package python.x86_64 0:2.7.1-1.fc15 will be updated
> > --> Processing Dependency: python = 2.7.1-1.fc15 for package:
> > tkinter-2.7.1-1.fc15.x86_64
> > ---> Package python.i686 0:2.7.1-3.fc15 will be obsoleting
> > --> Processing Dependency: python-libs(x86-32) = 2.7.1-3.fc15 for
> > package: python-2.7.1-3.fc15.i686
>
> Looks like it is replacing python-argparse?
>
> An obsolete will pull in both archs, I believe.
>
> -sv
Yes, it now has this in it:
Provides: python-argparse = %{version}-%{release}
Obsoletes: python-argparse < 1.1-3
What would be the best solution for that now?
Maybe this?:
Provides: python-argparse = %{version}-%{release}%{?_isa}
python-argparse itself was noarch, so this makes no sense either to
me...
(CC'ing fpc)
At [1], there is no such case documented...
Thomas
[1]http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Renaming.2Frep...
Thanks - I'd like to see what the FPC says.
-sv