Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
During the FESCo meeting, there was some question with regards to
ocaml multilib-osity-ness. I will admit to not fully understanding
what's up here, but can we address this and either fix it or provide
some response to fesco to assuage their concerns?
[13:10] <tibbs> I don't think the original, accepted
guidelines are any
better on this issue.
[13:11] <tibbs> So we're basically rejecting good changes
because the
original document has something that someone doesn't like.
[13:11] <tibbs> Which is... kind of backwards.
The comments weren't relevant directly to what was being voted on, so,
backwards/offtopic +1 here too. ??
-- Rex