Sanford Rockowitz <rockowitz(a)minsoft.com> wrote:
Thanks for the swift reply. Your request for the a link to the
pointed me in the right direction. Even though the -n option to
fedora-review specifies the name of the spec file in the current
directory, fedora-review was using a slate spec file in the input
srpm. So it seems to be a workflow issue, not a spec file syntax issue.
Didn't Fedora-review warn you that the spec files differed? It really
should wave a big red flag in such cases.