On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 06:22:39AM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> Register VirtualProvides (Patrice Dumas) :
Not clear enough. Many packages apply virtual provides not covered by
these lists (e.g. alternate package names, obsoletes/provides, legacy
provides etc.) This proposal doesn't specify which class of virtual
provides it is aiming at.
Thanks for the input, I completly forgot about those since they are
outside of the scope, though alternate names is at the limit... I am indeed
focused on alternate functionalities or similar provides. I'll update.