Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On Mon, 2006-10-02 at 07:51 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>> On Tue, 2006-09-26 at 10:53 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
>> It's a fault to remove *.la's.
> Thanks so much for the constructive input.
What do you expect as an answer to somebody who has been and is
spreading FUD on libtool for a very long time, has a web page called
"libtool sucks" ...
So, if I retitled the webpage
"libtool rocks! (except when dealing with .la files in rpm packaging)"
would that help?
(Hmm... sounds good, I think I'll do that anyway)
Regardless, there are *real* problems outlined and addressed in this
proposal and said webpage. If I've made errors/omissions, please point
them out, but jumping on a soapbox and yelling "FUD!" isn't helping anyone.