On Fri, 2005-07-15 at 10:45 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Fri, 15 Jul 2005 01:09:01 -0700, Michael A. Peters wrote:
> I know that with shared libraries, it generally is not a good idea to
> push an update that involves versioning a shared library because the
> user may have software their system that is linked against the older
> shared library, but is there a general policy about other software?
With "versioning a shared library" here you mean a change in SONAME?
> If your package is the only one which accesses the shared
> problem. This is most certainly the case when the package doesn't provide
> a public API and if no other package implements an API either. Hence:
> no dependencies in Extras => don't worry about upgrades.
OK - cool