Braden McDaniel <braden(a)endoframe.com> writes:
On Tue, 2009-09-15 at 19:12 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Surely this is a bug, not something that every single specfile must
> work around.
If it's a bug, then how do you propose a specfile should
"Requires" that *can* be satisfied by any architecture?
Why would it need to? I should only have to require "foo", I should
not have to know whether foo comes in arch-specific or arch-independent
form. It should be up to the buildsystem to acquire the version that
is most appropriate for the target arch being built.
regards, tom lane