On Thu, 2012-05-24 at 11:35 +0200, Brendan Jones wrote:
On 05/24/2012 11:13 AM, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-05-24 at 10:18 +0200, Brendan Jones wrote:
>> To cater for existing RPMFusion users, I can be clear in the changelog /
>> update notes that this Fedora package is replacing the one in qtractor
>> and they should install qtractor-freeworld if MP3 support is desired.
>> Sound OK?
>
> I don't have a strong opinion either way, but if I was implementing it,
> I'd follow the following steps:
>
> 1. Push qtractor-freeworld into RPM Fusion and have it obsolete
> qtractor
> 2. Finish getting qtractor reviewed in Fedora
> 3. A week or two after (1) happens (and *before* qtractor gets
> pushed to testing in Fedora), remove the obsoletes from
> qtractor-freeworld
> 4. Build qtractor in Fedora
>
> The advantage of this process is that most RPM Fusion qtractor users get
> qtractor-freeworld automatically (and the longer the obsoletes is left
> in, the more RPM Fusion users get qtractor-freeworld).
>
Sure - however we should still implement alternatives in the
qtractor-freeworld package right?
(btw review is approved in Fedora already - although I've pulled the
update for the moment)
I'm afraid I know very little about alternatives, so I'm not in the
position to give advice. If I understand what Nicolas is saying,
alternatives make more sense than having two versions that conflict.
Jonathan