Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
On Fri, 2008-04-04 at 13:29 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> I see a few Lua packages have appeared in the review queue today.
> I checked out the specs and they all seem very clean. There are a few
> issues (/usr/lib/lua seems to be unowned in rawhide, although
> /usr/lib/lua/5.1 is owned by the lua package), the luasql packages
> leave /usr/lib/lua/5.1/luasql unowned, etc.) but these seem to be
> minor packaging issues.
> So, we need to decide whether we want to just go ahead with these
> packages, or whether we want to do the "wait for guidelines" game
> again. Is anyone interesting in writing some guidleines? It seems
> like they'd be pretty tiny. Hans, the main Lua package seems to be
> yours; are you interested in putting something together?
I don't see a reason for a hold here. I would love to see Hans (or
someone qualified) whip up some guidelines.
I also don't see a reason for a hold. As for me being the lua maintainer, thats
only because it got orphaned and its used in a few games I maintain. My lua
knowledge is limited. So lets first see how these new packages go, and if there
is a need for lua specific guidelines at all.