On Wed, 2006-07-19 at 10:03 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On Wed, 2006-07-19 at 16:15 +0200, Axel Thimm wrote:
On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 08:54:22AM -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
Axel Thimm wrote:
Two independent reviewer considered this a blocker for a review's acceptance (even though it's marked "preferred").
The reviewers need to be whacked with a clue-stick. A working (non-broken) buildroot is *not* a blocker.
The point you seem to be missing, your buildroot is broken: buildroot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root
And you missed the point that *in the context of Fedora Extras*, it's not broken.
Rebuilding rpms by users is not amongst the Fedora tasks? FE is living in the ivory towers of mock?
With all due respect, ....
Ralf