On 30/08/2007, Patrice Dumas <pertusus(a)free.fr> wrote:
I think that there are 2 distinct issues that are raised in your
* tex related package names
* virtual requires/provides
I think that they should be discussed apart. The second issue could be
solved simply without the packaging commitee ruling, but by asking
Jindrich to add the virtual provide. Then the use of this provide could
be advocated in the guidelines.
I suggest discussing the virtual provides in one of the texlive
For the tex related package names, my personnal point of view would
not to distinguish tex and latex add-ons (at least in the name). I have
a slight preference for prepending tex- to all the tex/latex related
Yes - I favour that too, but put other suggestions up there for consideration.
Fedora-packaging mailing list