On Sat, Oct 14, 2006 at 02:20:19PM +0300, Ville Skyttä wrote:
On Sat, 2006-10-14 at 13:05 +0200, Enrico Scholz wrote:
> Axel.Thimm(a)ATrpms.net (Axel Thimm) writes:
> > The outcome for me is that the "drawback" of keeping *.la files
> > unconditionally is that some *.devel files get a couple too many
> > BRs,
-devel packages get bloated Requires, not BuildRequires.
Yes, thanks, that's correct and what I meant.
...and in many cases, end up unnecessarily bloating linkage of
binaries/libs in main packages too, making things like soname changes
even more painful than they already are...
I think the thread made clear that this is not the case.
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net