"Tom 'spot' Callaway" <tcallawa(a)redhat.com> writes:
>An easy to way to fix this would be to have
"%{?disttag}" appended to the
>"Release:" line of the spec by the build system, and have the "."
returned
>by the macro
...
I prefer the %{?disttag:.%{disttag}} syntax for use, if for no other
reason than it makes the macro a little cleaner.
IMO, the opposite it true... defining the macro happens once at a central
place invisible for most people, but it will be used in hundreds of .spec
files (perhaps). So I would prefer a clear and simple usage.
Enrico